Feel The Byte

Sunday, February 25, 2007

Dear Lou Dobbs #2

Dear Lou Dobbs,

After recently contacting you and informing you of LULAC and the American GI Forum's initiative to free the two border patrol agents I received this email from the National LULAC. We believe it is out of an attempt to gain notoriety by rerouting the press through the National Organization or it is an attempt to quash. Please read the email below.

 

Subject: Border Patrol Issue

 

 ==============================

 

Dear Board Members,

 

Today our National Board met via a conference call regarding the resolution which was passed at our State Board meeting this past weekend. The resolution referenced our position regarding two Border Patrol Officers. As you recall, we do not endorse thier actions but mainly question the serverity of the punishment and asked for a pardon.

 

After much discussion it was voted by the National Board to enforce a "gag order" on all members of the organization, not only our Texas LULAC members, regarding speaking to the media on this issue. If a member of the media calls you please refer them to the National Office.

 

Please do not feel that our efforts were in vain because part of the end result is now that the National Office is going to move on looking into this type of sentencing with our Legislators in Washington. The smallest victory in the midst of a defeat, no matter how small, is still a victory. Hold you heads up high as proud Texas LULAC members and know that we did the right thing.

 

Please make sure that all of the councils in your district abide by our National Board's decision and let us now move on to other issues that effect Texas.

 

Thank you again for all of your continued support.

 

Roger C. Rocha, Jr.

 

State Director - Texas LULAC

===================================

The LULAC Founding Chapter remains dedicated to this cause regardless of gag orders censorship or threats. The American GI Forum remains unwavering.

==============================

 

From: Jaime Kenedeno [mailto:kingalonzoalvarezdepinedaxiii@gmail.com]

Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2007 10:34 AM

To: RosaRosales@LULAC.org; Rocha_roger@msn.com

Subject: Fwd: [GI Forum National Report] National LULAC issues "gag order" on local LULAC C...

 

 

 

Good Luck shutting South Texas up. I already told Lou Dobbs LULAC supports the Compean & Ramos. The cover up will not continue. The way I was brought up; when you give a man your word you better damn well keep it. The American GI Forum will stand alone if need be.

 

=================================

 

On 2/24/07, Brent Wilkes <BWilkes@lulac.org> wrote:

 

    Are you saying the GI Forum believes there should be no repercussions for law enforcement who shoot unarmed suspects in the back and then attempt to cover up what they did?

 

    

 

    Brent A. Wilkes

 

    National Executive Director

 

    League of United Latin American Citizens

 

    2000 L Street, NW, Suite 610

 

    Washington , DC 20036

 

 

Dear Lou Dobbs,

CONTINUED>>>>>>

 

Why are these guys against us Lou?

 

Do they want the credit or do they want

 

  

Jaime Kenedeno       

to BWilkes, RosaRosales, Rocha_roger,

 

First of all this "unarmed suspect" was in a physical altercation with the Agents. The chain of custody with the ballistics is compromised. Aldrete is a known drug trafficker and there is the testimony of who; saying he was unarmed? If you think this guy is unarmed, surely he is trustworthy enough to work for you? Why not hire him while he is still innocent Brent? A Golden Elite Pass who gets that kind of latitude and for Aldrete he abandoned another vehicle full of dope while enjoying the above the law benefits of passing through check points unchecked. Aldrete is not an American nor is he a Mexican National coming to America in search of work, he does not possess the rights of a US Citizen nor does he respect the rights of other American Citizens nor does he respect our laws. Maybe if the shooter on the Mountain would have aimed for the head the DHS wouldn't be in cover up mode and pawning lower ranking law enforcement to save their own a$$. Wasn't he shot in the ass, as he was running for the refuge of the Rio Bravo; because he just got caught with a load of dope as the DHS agent watched with binoculars. I wonder what his interest was in Aldrete? Do some homework Brent. And nobody believes in shooting unarmed suspects in the back but we do believe this sends a wrong message to our law enforcement on the front line and we do believe it is not the message we want to send to our youth aspiring to become law enforcement officers. We support our law enforcement in situations as this one involving a known drug trafficker and we support a full investigation into the cover up by the DHS. Tell me the DHS Agent's name and how he is tied to Aldrete the drug trafficker?

===============================

 

Dear Brent and Distinguished Readers,

 

Prior to the Press Release we researched these events and even had the DOJ Representative on Talk Radio. The prosecutions story is based on the DHS field investigation conducted predominantly by a single agent who has signifigant ties to the drug dealer Aldrete. Aldrete was in our country, disrespecting our laws and our citizens. I believe the readers can decide for themselves. When a report is issued to congress redacting the DHS Agents name to me is an obvious red flag. Also these two border patrol agents are not the only law enforcement agents that Sutton has prosecuted. This other prosecution is mentioned in detail in a previous email. In my eyes it is better ten guilty go free than 1 innocent human being be convicted. Aldrete is a drug trafficker and we believe he was armed and the prosecution has withheld exculpatory evidence as well as a botched field investigation / cover-up by DHS agents connected to the drug trafficker Aldrete. Please inform me if the you do not receive the attachments.

 

Respectfully,

 

Jaime Kenedeno

 

361 510 6406

 

 

---------- Forwarded message ----------

From: Brent Wilkes < BWilkes@lulac.org>

Date: Feb 24, 2007 7:20 PM

Subject: RE: FW: Email Sutton Statements to Kenedeno

To: Jaime Kenedeno <kingalonzoalvarezdepinedaxiii@gmail.com >

 

Jaime,

 

 

 

I did not get the attachments you mentioned.

 

 

 

Brent A. Wilkes

 

National Executive Director

 

League of United Latin American Citizens

 

============================

From: Jaime Kenedeno [mailto:kingalonzoalvarezdepinedaxiii@gmail.com]

Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2007 7:08 PM

To: BWilkes@lulac.org; raymancera@msn.com

Subject: Re: FW: Email Sutton Statements to Kenedeno

 

 

 

Dear Brent and Distinguished Readers,

 

Prior to the Press Release we researched these events and even had the DOJ Representative on Talk Radio. The prosecutions story is based on the DHS field investigation conducted predominantly by a single agent who has signifigant ties to the drug dealer Aldrete. Aldrete was in our country, disrespecting our laws and our citizens. I believe the readers can decide for themselves. When a report is issued to congress redacting the DHS Agents name to me is an obvious red flag. Also these two border patrol agents are not the only law enforcement agents that Sutton has prosecuted. This other prosecution is mentioned in detail in a previous email. In my eyes it is better ten guilty go free than 1 innocent human being be convicted. Aldrete is a drug trafficker and we believe he was armed and the prosecution has withheld exculpatory evidence as well as a botched field investigation / cover-up by DHS agents connected to the drug trafficker Aldrete. Please inform me if the you do not receive the attachments.

 

Respectfully,

 

Jaime Kenedeno

 

On 2/24/07, Brent Wilkes <BWilkes@lulac.org> wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

Brent A. Wilkes

 

National Executive Director

 

League of United Latin American Citizens

 

============================

From: Ray Mancera [mailto: raymancera@msn.com]

Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2007 1:25 PM

To: Brent A Wilkes

Cc: Rosa Rosales

Subject: Email Sutton Statements to Kenedeno

 

 

 

Brent,

 

Please email to Kenedeno the two statements issued by Sutton.  You may be surprised he may have never read them and has been reacting to media reports only.  But do challenge him to post the statements to ALL his readers (not be selective) since he is so eager to post our internal communications.  This way we use him to disseminate Sutton's story and let his readers come to their own conclusions.  I live in El Paso and have followed this case closely but did not know the facts of the case if were not that you forwarded Sutton's statements two days ago!!

 

 

 

Ray Mancera

 

 

 

 

 

--

Kenedeno & Associates

 

 

--

Kenedeno & Associates

2 attachments — Download all attachments

                        Prosecution Stmt by Sutton re Compean and Ramos Jan 2007-1.pdf

25K View as HTML Download

                        Conviction Stmt by Sutton re Compean and Ramos Aug 2006-1.pdf

278K View as HTML Download

 

 

 

Jaime Kenedeno       

to BWilkes, RosaRosales, Rocha_roger,

 

First of all this "unarmed suspect" was in a physical altercation with the Agents. The chain of custody with the ballistics is compromised. Aldrete is a known drug trafficker and there is the testimony of who; saying he was unarmed? If you think this guy is unarmed, surely he is trustworthy enough to work for you? Why not hire him while he is still innocent Brent? A Golden Elite Pass who gets that kind of latitude and for Aldrete he abandoned another vehicle full of dope while enjoying the above the law benefits of passing through check points unchecked. Aldrete is not an American nor is he a Mexican National coming to America in search of work, he does not possess the rights of a US Citizen nor does he respect the rights of other American Citizens nor does he respect our laws. Maybe if the shooter on the Mountain would have aimed for the head the DHS wouldn't be in cover up mode and pawning lower ranking law enforcement to save their own a$$. Wasn't he shot in the ass, as he was running for the refuge of the Rio Bravo; because he just got caught with a load of dope as the DHS agent watched with binoculars. I wonder what his interest was in Aldrete? Do some homework Brent. And nobody believes in shooting unarmed suspects in the back but we do believe this sends a wrong message to our law enforcement on the front line and we do believe it is not the message we want to send to our youth aspiring to become law enforcement officers. We support our law enforcement in situations as this one involving a known drug trafficker and we support a full investigation into the cover up by the DHS. Tell me the DHS Agent's name and how he is tied to Aldrete the drug trafficker?

===============================

Thank You, and now let us finish the JOB we started.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Jaime Kenedeno < kingalonzoalvarezdepinedaxiii@gmail.com>
Date: Feb 21, 2007 9:53 PM
Subject: Re: What happened??? & Is that the way it's gonna be???
To: RosaRosales@lulac.org , "tgmorales@aol.com" < tgmorales@aol.com>
Cc: joeaortiz@yahoo.com, payo720@aol.com, "Dr. Nick Adame" <nickadame@sbcglobal.net>, lulaccouncil1@yahoo.com

The Little Red Hen


In the tale, the little red hen finds a grain of wheat, and asks for help from the other farmyard animals to plant it. No one is willing to help. W hen the wheat matures, she asks for help to harvest it, then thresh it, then mill it, and bake the flour into bread. At each stage she gets no volunteers. Finally she asks who will help her eat the bread. All the previous non-participants eagerly volunteer, but she declines their help and eats it with her chicks, leaving none for others.

Maybe over the years this has been the norm?

Now, there is great effort and work being put forth and we are engaging, putting ourselves on the front line. Come, join us with your ideas; but have an open mind for our ideas as well, We do not always agree, but that does not make us enemies. Let us all try to express ourselves more positively than negatively; if at all possible.

Hello Everyone,

Just wanted to share this with everyone.  The resolution we passed regarding the two Border Patrol Officers made Lou Dobbs and now it appears CNN wants to speak with us.  Pretty cool.  Kudos go out toe Elvia and Xavier on this.

Please read below.

 

Per the call from CNN yesterday, information below from CNN Lou Dobbs Show mentioning LULAC Texas resolution. Reporter still wanting information as to why LULAC Texas has decided to take this position.

 

 

"Still ahead here, charges tonight that prosecutors withheld key evidence in the trial of two former Border Patrol agents sent to prison.

We'll have that special report.

And Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, well, he's praising efforts to build a fence along our southern border with Mexico. Our border, however, is wide open to illegal aliens, to terrorists, to drug smugglers.

We'll have that story.

And the war on our middle class, it's escalating. New government figures tonight illustrate the worsening plight of working men and women in this country.

That special report and a great deal more all coming up here next.

Stay with us.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

DOBBS: Important new developments tonight in the case of imprisoned former Border Patrol agents Compean and Ramos. Both sentenced to lengthy prison terms for shooting and wounding an illegal alien drug smuggler whom the prosecutors then gave immunity to testify against the agents. One of the defense attorneys now says government prosecutors failed to disclose a key document during that trial. A document that could have undermined the government's entire case.

Casey Wian has the story.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

CASEY WIAN, CNN CORRESPONDENT (voice over): At the heart of the prosecution's case against former Border Patrol agents Ignacio Ramos and Jose Compean was the alleged cover-up of the shooting of a Mexican illegal alien drug smuggler. Now the online publication WorldNetDaily reports the existence of a Homeland Security Department document suggesting two Border Patrol supervisors were at scene and knew about the shooting.

That's consistent with the agents' statements that they did not report the shooting because they believed supervisors already knew about it. The attorney for Ignacio Ramos says prosecutors never disclosed the existence of the documents, which could be grounds for a new trial.

MARY STILLINGER, ATTORNEY FOR IGNACIO RAMOS: The government is really charged with a higher responsibility than just winning a case. The government is charged with seeking justice in trying to do the right thing.

So they can't hold back on evidence just because it's helpful to the defense. And, if fact, they have an obligation to turn that over.

WIAN: The document lists the names of Border Patrol agents and supervisors who were at the scene. It also says, "Investigation disclosed that none of the above agents reported the shooting or the subsequent cover-up."

REP. TED POE (R), TEXAS: The more that comes out about this case, the more it seems that the prosecution was relentless in making sure these border agents were convicted. And this is just another example of another piece of evidence that the defense should have known about, the jury should have known about during the trial to make their determination on whether these border agents even violated the law or not.

WIAN: U.S. attorney Johnny Sutton did not return calls seeking comment on the new evidence and other documents raising questions about his decision to prosecute the agents and grant immunity to an admitted drug smuggler.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: I think our police officers, our law enforcement have been undermined. WIAN: Meanwhile, Ramos and Compean supporters are raising money to buy air time for these television ads demanding the White House pardon the former agents.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

WIAN: Finally, the Texas branch of the Latino advocacy group LULAC has drafted a resolution supporting a pardon for Ramos and Compean. LULAC says it believes the 11 and 12-year sentences were too harsh -- Lou.

DOBBS: Well, it's what now, four months since the sentencing? LULAC taking this stand. I have to give them credit.

They have been absolutely absent in this case despite the fact that both of these agents are Hispanic-Americans. Did they have any indication as to why they were joining in this now?

WIAN: No, they did not. We asked them for further clarification, more information about -- about this position they've taken. They didn't give it to us. We're still hoping we'll get it soon.

What we did find out, though, there's a couple of other leading Latino advocacy groups. MALDEF and the National Council of La Raza still are refusing to take up position on this issue -- Lou.

DOBBS: One would think to their great shame.

Thank you very much.

Casey Wian from Los Angeles.

 



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Jaime Kenedeno <kingalonzoalvarezdepinedaxiii@gmail.com>
Date: Feb 18, 2007 9:53 PM
Subject: Dear Lou Dobbs,
To: RosaRosales@lulac.org , "tgmorales@aol.com" < tgmorales@aol.com>

Dear Lou Dobbs,

 

Last week LULAC & the American GI Forum held a Press Conference regarding the recent Border Patrol injustice. 

 

Many of the DHS investigative reports were filed by Christopher Sanchez, who appears to have played a major role in the DHS field investigation. Sanchez appears to be playing a role shepherding the drug dealer around and framing the evidence that ended up being used by Johnny Sutton to put Ramos and Compean in prison for 11 and 12 years respectively." This cover up has raised Red Flags and revealed Conflicts of Interest involving DHS Agent Chris Sanchez and the wrongful Imprisonment of BP Agents Ramos & Compean.

 

Now, the local media after attending the press conference and conducting in depth interviews with the LULAC and AGIF officials refuse to broadcast anything involving this issue.

 

We believe there is an attempt to quash this story and the effort to bring forth justice for these two men.

 

We are willing to appear on your show or do what is necessary to achieve Justice for these men. We ask for your assistance in bypassing the local media entities so we might bring justice for the agents.

 

One of the Media Present was Jaime Powell who was the only media contact when the Cheney Whittington incident was released. We feel there is a govt censorship in place on this issue. Once again we request your assistance.

 

Sincerely

 

Anton S Haley (Human Rights Advocate)


johngifford1440@yahoo.com

            date                 Feb 15, 2007 5:27 PM

            subject             Press Conference     

            mailed-by                   gmail.com      

 

 

           

 

 Press Release

 

 

 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE to all media entities and politicos

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

           

 

Contact:

           

 

Joe A Ortiz, American GI Forum (Richard Rocco Chapter), (361) 510-6406, joeaortiz@yahoo.com

 

 

 

Contact:

           

 

Dr. Nick Adame, League of United Latin American Citizens LULAC #1 (Founding Chapter),

(361) 658-6982, nickadame@sbcglobal.net

 

 

 

           

 

 

 

DATE: Friday, February 16, 2007

           

 

 

 

HEADLINE:

 

The American GI Forum (Richard Rocco Chapter) and the League of United Latin America Citizens (Founding Chapter) is holding a press conference.

           

 

 

 

 

 

WHERE: 1417 Horne Road @ Meeting Center

 

WHEN: Friday February 16, 2007, 1:30 PM

 

The recent Border Patrol Shooting and subsequent Investigation has raised Red Flags and revealed Conflicts of Interest.

 

All media entities and politicos are urged to attend. This is sure to effect the Presidential election and debates. The position of LULAC & the American GI Forum is based on extensive research into the incendiary event.  The floodgates of controversy remain open with little effect on our Executive Branch and it's Presidential ability to Pardon in the interest of Justice.

 

Press Release Courtesy of Kenedeno & Associates

 

###



On 2/18/07, Jaime Kenedeno < kingalonzoalvarezdepinedaxiii@gmail.com> wrote:

Border Betrayal

If you would like to contribute to the former Border Patrol Agents Ignacio Ramos and Jose Compean fund, please send your donation to:

Border Patrol Agents Legal Defense and Relief Fund, P.O. Box 47208, Tampa, Florida 33647

• To read the National Border Patrol Council's rebuttal to the U.S. Attorney's office in the case against Ramos and Compean, please visit their Web site:National Border Patrol Council rebuttalexternal link

• You can also contact the White House: http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/external link or call 202-456-1111.

• Or you can send an e-mail to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales:http://www.usdoj.gov/contact -us.html external link or call 202-514-2001.

Well it is clear not one of you out of a few thousand have went against supporting the Border Patrol Pardon.

Where is the Support from the National LULAC Members and the National AGIF Members?


Power of the Pen Bothers and Sisters.

Use it or lose it

lest cast a blind eye

"Aldrete-Davila was issued what amounts to a 'Gold Elite' border pass," Andy Ramirez, chairman of the Friends of the Border Patrol, told WND. "With the stamp for multiple entries into the United States, Aldrete-Davila didn't have to run the back roads as a drug smuggler any more. He could tell his drug bosses in Mexico that he could drive their loads right through border crossing points without much worry."

See full story below

And even blind eyes get poked out.

And the Media or lack of media (I mean)?

Any of you guys heard what Lou Dobbs  has been saying lately?

I understand, soon he is going to start mentioning you guys by name.


WND Exclusive
INVASION USA
Border-agent investigator had tie to smuggler
Played major role in Ramos-Compean case but name blacked out in report

Posted: February 9, 2007
1:00 a.m. Eastern

By Jerome R. Corsi
© 2007 WorldNetDaily.com

According to official documents in WND's possession, a Department of Homeland Security agent played a major role in managing the drug smuggler and conducting the field investigation in the incident that landed Border Patrol officers Ignacio Ramos and Jose Compean in federal prison for more than a decade.

Yet, in the heavily redacted 77-page DHS report submitted to Congress Wednesday there is no explicit discussion of the role DHS Special Agent Christopher Sanchez played in the case.

Rep. John Culberson, R-Texas, yesterday called for the resignation of four DHS investigators, including Assistant Inspector General Elizabeth Redman, after DHS Inspector General Richard Skinner testified under oath his deputies had lied to Congress about non-existent reports that were supposed to have established Ramos and Compean as rogue cops who wanted to "shoot some Mexicans."

(Story continues below)


Osbaldo Aldrete-Davila

WND has obtained a copy of the government-issued border pass given to Osbaldo Aldrete-Davila, the drug smuggler granted immunity to testify against Ramos and Compean. The border pass allowed multiple entries to the U.S. and carried the signature and badge number of Sanchez.

The border pass appears to have been issued March 16, 2005, the day Sanchez brought Aldrete-Davila to William Beaumont Army Medical Center in El Paso, Texas, to have a bullet removed from his right thigh.

"Aldrete-Davila was issued what amounts to a 'Gold Elite' border pass," Andy Ramirez, chairman of the Friends of the Border Patrol, told WND. "With the stamp for multiple entries into the United States, Aldrete-Davila didn't have to run the back roads as a drug smuggler any more. He could tell his drug bosses in Mexico that he could drive their loads right through border crossing points without much worry."

WND previously reported Aldrete-Davila was implicated in a second drug bust in October 2005, subsequent to the Feb. 17, 2005 incident with Ramos and Compean in which he abandoned a 1989 Ford Econoline containing 743 pounds of marijuana driven across the border from Mexico.

"With that border pass, Aldrete-Davila had the green light," Ramirez told WND. "He might have been indicted if the vehicle he drove in October 2005 with 1,000 pounds of dope was identified back to a border-crossing photograph, but he probably never had to be arrested."

The prosecutor of Ramos and Compean, U.S. Attorney Johnny Sutton, has told WND that Aldrete-Davila was never arrested a second time for a drug offense in October 2005, but Sutton has never denied the smuggler was indicted for such an offense.

Medical records obtained by WND clearly establish the bullet wounds suffered by Aldrete-Davila involved a lateral wound to the left buttocks, not a "shot in the back" as repeatedly claimed by Sutton.

The medical records document that March 16, 2005, Dr. Winston Marne removed a large bullet fragment from Aldrete-Davila's right thigh. The records indicate bullet fragments were found in Aldrete-Davila's pelvis but not removed. The path of the bullet is clearly described as entering in the left side of the left buttocks, traversing the groin area, and lodging in the right thigh.

The records also indicate reconstructive surgery was performed on Aldrete-Davila the same day at the army hospital. Damage to the urethra required a catheter to be inserted. Aldrete-Davila was placed under anesthetics for the operation and was heavily sedated for pain.

The drug smuggler was released from the army hospital the same day and given to the protective custody of Sanchez, who also took with him the bullet fragment removed from Aldrete-Davila's thigh.

WND has learned Aldrete-Davila spent the night of March 16, 2005, at the home of Sanchez.

"Christopher Sanchez shows up again with the shell fragments from Aldrete-Davila's body," Ramirez pointed out to WND. "Sanchez was evidently Aldrete-Davila's handler and from the looks of it, he did a good job. Taking that bullet home broke the chain of evidence. From there on, what good would a report be even if it established the bullet was fired from Ramos' gun?"

WND previously reported that the weapons identifications ballistics analysis performed by the Texas Department of Public Safety on the bullet fragment held by Sanchez did not match the bullet to the weapons fired Feb. 17, 2005 by Ramos or Compean.

March 16, 2005, was also the date "Osvaldo" Aldrete-Davila signed and accepted his offer of immunity from Sutton's office, supposedly signed before the medical operation was performed and the border pass issued. There is no time stamp noted on the immunity document nor mention of the location where the document was signed.

WND has previously reported Special Agent Sanchez's role in learning about the identity of Aldrete-Davila from Border Patrol Agent Rene Sanchez in Wilcox, Arizona. Aldrete-Davila and Rene Sanchez grew up together in Mexico and the drug dealer's identity was first discovered through these family connections.

WND repeatedly has noted many of the DHS investigative reports were filed by Sanchez, who appears to have played a major role in the DHS field investigation.

"There was no reason to have redacted Christopher Sanchez's name from the report," Ramirez told WND. "Sanchez was a DHS special agent. But everywhere you look, Sanchez shows up playing a role shepherding the drug dealer around and framing the evidence that ended up being used by Johnny Sutton to put Ramos and Compean in prison for 11 and 12 years respectively."


Special offers:

"PREMEDITATED MERGER: How leaders are stealthily transforming USA into North American Union"

Autographed! – Pat Buchanan unleashed on border crisis

Tom Tancredo: America itself "In Mortal Danger"

Get Minutemen founder's new book

Get special Whistleblower issue: "SECRETS OF THE INVASION"

<a href=" http://shop.wnd.com/store/item.asp?ITEM_ID

...
On 2/15/07, Jaime Kenedeno < kingalonzoalvarezdepinedaxiii@gmail.com> wrote:

 

 Press Release

 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE to all media entities and politicos

 

 

 

 

Contact:

Joe A Ortiz, American GI Forum (Richard Rocco Chapter), (361) 510-6406, joeaortiz@yahoo.com

 

Contact:

Dr. Nick Adame, League of United Latin American Citizens LULAC #1 (Founding Chapter),
(361) 658-6982, nickadame@sbcglobal.net

 

 

DATE: Friday, February 16, 2007

 

HEADLINE:

The American GI Forum (Richard Rocco Chapter) and the League of United Latin America Citizens (Founding Chapter) is holding a press conference.

 

 

WHERE: 1417 Horne Road @ Meeting Center

WHEN: Friday February 16, 2007, 1:30 PM

The recent Border Patrol Shooting and subsequent Investigation has raised Red Flags and revealed Conflicts of Interest.

All media entities and politicos are urged to attend. This is sure to effect the Presidential election and debates. The position of LULAC & the American GI Forum is based on extensive research into the incendiary event.  The floodgates of controversy remain open with little effect on our Executive Branch and it's Presidential ability to Pardon in the interest of Justice.

Press Release Courtesy of Kenedeno & Associates

###

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


--
Kenedeno & Associates

Friday, February 9, 2007

Fwd: [Kenedeno Hardcopy] Dear David Bright: :Is there not a resolution on which we...



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Jaime Kenedeno <kingalonzoalvarezdepinedaxiii@gmail.com >
Date: Feb 10, 2007 12:57 AM
Subject: Fwd: [Kenedeno Hardcopy] Dear David Bright: :Is there not a resolution on which we...
To: mikewest@delmar.edu



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Jaime Kenedeno < kingalonzoalvarezdepinedaxiii@gmail.com >
Date: Feb 10, 2007 12:51 AM
Subject: Re: [Kenedeno Hardcopy] Dear David Bright: :Is there not a resolution on which we...
To: David Bright < dbright@wattslawfirm.com >
Cc: mikewest@delmar.edu, "Augie Rivera, Jr." < ariverajr@swbell.net>, treymc@americanbank.com, TreyMc@aol.com, Dawoddds@aol.com, cadler106@sbcglobal.net, cgarcia@delmar.edu

Dear Dave,


I wrote this write after I received your reply. I have great respect for you as a human being and this letter is written without any intended disrespect.


David Bright: "When I say I don't have a dog in that Del Mar fight, I mean it".

.

JK: OK, Mr. Westergren is not "a dog in that fight"?


David Bright: I have met the current President of Del Mar one time, I think it was over a year ago, and in passing during a peace rally at the campus. I wouldn't recognize him if he walked into a room right now.

 

JK: And you wouldn't recognize me either right?

 

Let's just say you did recognize him; would you go up to him and give him a big hug or would you shake his hand or would you act like you don't recognize him and play dumb as you walk along side him?

 

David Bright: I myself have protested the tenure of at least one university President, Lorene Rogers of U.T., so I certainly have nothing against people opposing a university President.

 

JK: Cogently, why were you obtuse to the tenure of Lorene Rogers?

Did you "have a dog in that fight"?

 

JK: We have asked for Del Mar President Carlos Garcia to be placed on administrative leave pending the outcome of the investigations. Yet, he placed his accuser on administrative leave and did not want to hear any rumors of Ms Cox being fired.

 

David Bright: Mike Westergren is absolutely a good friend, and I am sure that I have many friends who are on the other side.

 

JK: I understand he is a good friend David. According to Documents (duplicates) an attorney client relationship between you and Mr Westergren was established and it was within a very close proximity to "A Del Mar Fight" (litigation). If these documents are false or tampered with our only option is to present them to the proper authorities.

 

David Bright: I have no idea of whether the current President of Del Mar is doing a great job or not, and I am not in a position to know, because I neither work nor attend school there. That is not the issue that got me interested in this.

David Bright: What I do know is this: I read some allegations, many of them quite salacious, that were made both in a "We The People" news article and on the local Air America affiliate radio station, that are quite provably untrue. And I happen to know enough information to know that they are untrue. And that is the kind of thing that gets me thinking. Why? Because I watched for 8 years while the same thing was done to Bill Clinton. When the 6-year Whitewater investigation revealed nothing, the claim became, "Well, where there's smoke there's fire. With all this controversy, there must be something there." I watched "swift boaters" do their job on John Kerry. Throw it against the wall and see what sticks. They did it to many Democrats and even to their own John McCain.

I thought that was a tactic that the Republicans used, but not us. I thought that if we are right, we don't have to lie about our enemies.

At least that's how I conduct myself.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

JK: The Olson and Sansing articles were reporting on the Del Mar College / SGA / Select Faculty / President CGTA / In House Counsel Approved Event at Port Royal.

 

This story was Nationally Recognized and published by MSNBC

 

It is a fact that Del Mar had failed to fully investigate an SGA off-campus scandal. If this Del Mar College / SGA / Select Faculty / President CGTA / In House Counsel Approved Event at Port Royal would have been conducted properly, there would be nothing to report and nothing to investigate..

 

  There was a cover up in the Port Royal Fiasco investigation.

 

Dr Olson and Dr Sansing represent to the reader that there are allegations and continue into the Salacious nature of the allegations. These allegations coupled with Donna Strong's letter , as well as interviews I conducted with Port Royal attendees are pieces of the puzzle I suspect you were unaware of David.

This comment from a Del Mar Housekeeping Anonymous Input source regarding the Del Mar College / SGA / Select Faculty / President CGTA / In House Counsel Approved Event at Port Royal.

The most important point has been missed concerning this Del Mar thing. All student groups have college authorized advisors. They are supposed to be there to monitor and chaperon these events. The details of what happened in November, to my knowledge, did not come forward until January. What took so long? Why didn't the advisors stop all this stuff at the time? It seems to me that the advisors have a lot to answer for and other head should have rolled here?

 

 

(BTW it has been reported that the original articles were censored and published only after they were edited)

 

The allegations were not made by Sansing or Olson the allegations were made by DMC Students and Faculty and yes, they are disgraceful and disreputable in nature.

 

Dave, As Mr. Westergren's friend, ally or advocate I wouldn't put too much weight on anything the Heron broadcasts or publishes; The Radio Show is hard to listen to and the Paper is a boring read. Whether it speaks truth or not one must remain awake to listen or read and not many listen or read anyway. I always ask myself does the heron just sound drunk or is he really drunk?

 

And to think, the Heron was the one calling me a Whacko on live radio


On 2/2/07, David Bright < dbright@wattslawfirm.com> wrote:
When I say I don't have a dog in that Del Mar fight, I mean it.

I have met the current President of Del Mar one time, I think it was over a year ago, and in passing during a peace rally at the campus. I wouldn't recognize him if he walked into a room right now. I myself have protested the tenure of at least one university President, Lorene Rogers of U.T., so I certainly have nothing against people opposing a university President. Mike Westergren is absolutely a good friend, and I am sure that I have many friends who are on the other side. I have no idea of whether the current President of Del Mar is doing a great job or not, and I am not in a position to know, because I neither work nor attend school there. That is not the issue that got me interested in this.

What I do know is this: I read some allegations, many of them quite salacious, that were made both in a "We The People" news article and on the local Air America affiliate radio station, that are quite provably untrue. And I happen to know enough information to know that they are untrue. And that is the kind of thing that gets me thinking.

Why? Because I watched for 8 years while the same thing was done to Bill Clinton. When the 6-year Whitewater investigation revealed nothing, the claim became, "Well, where there's smoke there's fire. With all this controversy, there must be something there." I watched "swift boaters" do their job on John Kerry. Throw it against the wall and see what sticks. They did it to many Democrats and even to their own John McCain.

I thought that was a tactic that the Republicans used, but not us. I thought that if we are right, we don't have to lie about our enemies.

At least that's how I conduct myself.

David Bright
Watts Law Firm, L.L.P.
Tower II Building, 14th Floor
555 North Carancahua Street
Corpus Christi, Texas 78478-0801
Telephone:  361.887.0500
Toll Free: 888.887.0560
Facsimile:  361.887.0055
dbright@wattslawfirm.com




--
Kenedeno & Associates


--
Kenedeno & Associates


--
Kenedeno & Associates

Monday, February 5, 2007

Re: CCISD & Texas Education Code CHAPTER 25. ADMISSION, TRANSFER, AND ATTENDANCE

Dear Ms Shapiro and fellow Sen Education Committee members,

 

In an address to Sen Edu Committee

 

Presently, the bill below (HB 316) Texas Education Statute 25. is nothing  more than a railroad for the Nueces County JP Courts. It is unconstitutional,  discriminatory, illegal and injurious to CCISD Families.. 

 

What is wrong with the bill?

 

25.093.  PARENT CONTRIBUTING TO NONATTENDANCE

§ 25.095. WARNING NOTICES.  (a) A school district or

open-enrollment charter school shall notify a student's parent in writing at the beginning of the school year that if the student is absent from school on 10 or more days or parts of days within a six-month period in the same school year or on three or more days or parts of days within a four-week period:

 

          (1)  the student's parent is subject to prosecution under Section

25.093;

 

 

In a nutshell if the  student is absent unexcused for the given criteria and the District sends out  handbooks at the beginning of the year then the parent is guilty of Parent  Contributing to Non Attendance.

 

25.095 b does say

A school district shall notify a student's parent if the student has been absent from school, without excuse under Section 25.087, on three days or parts of days within a  four-week period. 

 

Notice the parts of days added and delineates from the original intent of the law.

 

Under 25.093 the wording only refers to days absent (not parts of days or tardies).

 

The fallacy of this law is that it does not differentiate between a student that is absent and a student  that is skipping or tardy.An absent student is one who does not arrive at school in the morning and is absent for the WHOLE Day. The student was never on campus. The Parent is responsible for the student getting to school.

 

Once the student is counted present in the morning, the student is in the custody of the School. If the student is tardy of skios (on campus or off campus) this happens on the watch of the school. This is also a security issue as well; there is no excuse for students coming and going outside of the lunch period and it is imperative that attendance irregularities be dealt with within 24 hours. This is easily done with our modern technology.

 

Instead, what we are seeing is the Attendance Officers documenting the absences as they accumulate and filing on the Parent and student when the number of absences are achieved.

 

Another fallacy resides in the Parental notification outreach process. There is parts of the law that dictate certain steps but if these steps are disregarded this is not a defense to the prosecution.

 

 Will you please look into these issues and help get some of these loopholes mended and the fallacial premises corrected.

 

I will send some more suggested amendment areas from my experiences; as well as those of others who, I  have witnessed get locked up and fleeced just because the JP position has accumulated too much power and the Little people have no recourse. I ask that  you help us out with fixing this law in the Interest of Justice.

 

                                                                                                                                         Respectfully,

                  

                                                                                                                                         Anton S Haley



--
Kenedeno & Associates


Anonymous Email
"Yeah!!, finally someone is listening to us (the parents). Those JP's and the attendance ofcrs do nothing but discourage (not encourage) students to drop out, then they wonder why there are big numbers of drop outs. Sending students to jail is not the answer, kids get discouraged w/the outrageous fines and community services assessed to them, so many will just drop out. It is ridiculous, don't these JP's realize that such a record can greatly affect a student trying to get into college?" 

On 2/2/07, Jaime Kenedeno < kingalonzoalvarezdepinedaxiii@gmail.com> wrote:
Texas Education Code CHAPTER 25. ADMISSION, TRANSFER, AND ATTENDANCE

When a parent takes his child to school and he arrives on time

(he becomes a student under the Jurisdiction of the school
administration); the child is in the custody of the school.



While the child is on school grounds he is subject to the rules of the
school as the school is subject to the custodial responsibility.




Anything that happens during the day is under the school's watch.



 If the student is absent during the middle of the day who's watch is it under?



 If the child is tardy or walking the halls; who's watch is it?




However, when the student is tardy or skipping during the middle
periods, the school admin, the attendance clerk and the truancy officer
engage themselves. They begin the documentation of the "truant events".





There is a computer that will call to inform the household that the
"student was absent one or more periods today". Keep in mind the
automated system is readily discounted by the administration when they

cannot find the reason it called. That is when the parent contacts the
school to inquire to specifically which class was the child absent or
tardy, why was the machine reporting the child absent?



Now all of this said kids roaming the halls, tardy and absent is being allowed by who?



 Who's custody did the parents release the child into?



But, once the truant events add up as they are allowed; the child and

the parents are charged with truancy and adult contributing to truancy
respectively. That means for the child an automatic slam dunk $500
ching ching, the parent slam dunked and another $500 ching ching and
then the other parent $500 ching ching. Now tell me how that is right

and just?



I have every right and every reason to write about this injustice. And I do have an angle, it is called EQUAL JUSTICE for all
Dear Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, CCISD, Legislators & South Texas Judiciary

In an agressive collateral campaign in advocacy of South Texas as a Whole; the issue of Education must be for the children (our future). I submit in good faith my "TWO CENTS" (Dos Centavos).

Legislation - Students need to be able to earn and get paid weekly. WIA JOB Grants attendance selective railroading must cease immediately. It is a racket of cushy JOBS and truant officers who cannot discourage even the skipping in the middle of the school day.

I remember MR Gonzalez (GONZO) at Carroll High School back in the days of punch card bubble in "chad like" attendance cards. Student office workers picked up the cards every period and they were processed immediately. Any irregularities were addressed AND Gonzo, Mr Lyons & Mr Mon were on patrol with the cutting edge in technology Walkie Talkies. Not one other school in CCISD had them at that time. Janitors were the security.

My point is where is the lag and why now that this area has been significantly beefed up.

How are these kids tardy or hiding out or coming and going without someone noticing. Then they file against the parent for contributing to truancy and the student is fined and the parent has no defense even if there was never any communication from the district informing the parent. No attorney is provided as the crime is punishable by fine only. WATT about the people who cant pay? I have watched JAG lock students and parents up. 1 student $500, 2 Parents $500 each equals $1500. Community Service is an option but is it worth the association with hardened Juveniles. If there is a chance of being jailed an attorney must be provided. Any appeal is denied and handed back without signature of Court. There is no transcript of the proceedings so strong arm tactics are practiced and rules are ignored to get rich off of the poor. quality assurance Judiciary Evolution incomplete work in progress


Justice of the peace courts have jurisdiction over criminal offenses that are punishable by fine only, and over civil cases in which the amount in controversy is small (not more than $5,000 in 1995).

.

Remember the technique used at Miller?

Change Grades?

Modify Attendance records?

That is how they do it at CCISD.

My son failed the 7th Grade  (2004-2005) and then failed in Summer School yet the Administrators Promoted him to the 8th Grade, The same thing for the 8th Grade at Cullen Middle School. However he performed well at SLGC Campus which is a rigid structured high discipline school. This school should be the model. It works.

Teach the test?

Make the numbers fit by rearranging the terminology?

Having certain students (who are at risk of not passing the TAKS) categorized in a way so their scores will not figure in the average.

Selectively classifying and targeting of certain students to enter the "revolving door" of our local legally untrained Justices of the Peace for tardies and truancy violations. And then no attorney to represent the kids so they are railroaded. Then when they cannot come up with the dinero they take the kids from the classroom in handcuffs and threaten to lock em up and do lock some of them up even though these violations are punishable by fine only. The JP has not the legal right or training to incarcerate a child or his parents for fine only violations.

Justice of the peace courts have jurisdiction over criminal offenses that are punishable by fine only, and over civil cases in which the amount in controversy is small (not more than $5,000 in 1995).

So the attendance issue is all about the money. If you can classify the student in a way to get paid then that is what they are told to do.


To encourage full participation, promote mutual understanding and cultivate shared responsibility throughout our community. To support everyone to do their best thinking and express it, To enable community members to search for inclusive solutions and build sustainable agreement



--
Kenedeno & Associates

Friday, February 2, 2007

CCISD & Texas Education Code CHAPTER 25. ADMISSION, TRANSFER, AND ATTENDANCE

Texas Education Code CHAPTER 25. ADMISSION, TRANSFER, AND ATTENDANCE

When a parent takes his child to school and he arrives on time
(he becomes a student under the Jurisdiction of the school
administration); the child is in the custody of the school.



While the child is on school grounds he is subject to the rules of the
school as the school is subject to the custodial responsibility.



Anything that happens during the day is under the school's watch.



If the student is absent during the middle of the day

who's watch is it under?




If the child is tardy or walking the halls; who's watch is it?



However, when the student is tardy or skipping during the middle
periods, the school admin, the attendance clerk and the truancy officer
engage themselves. They begin the documentation of the "truant events".




There is a computer that will call to inform the household that the
"student was absent one or more periods today". Keep in mind the
automated system is readily discounted by the administration when they
cannot find the reason it called. That is when the parent contacts the
school to inquire to specifically which class was the child absent or
tardy, why was the machine reporting the child absent?



Now all of this said kids roaming the halls, tardy
and absent is being allowed by who?



Who's custody did the parents release the child into?



But, once the truant events add up as they are allowed; the child and
the parents are charged with truancy and adult contributing to truancy
respectively. That means for the child an automatic slam dunk $500
ching ching, the parent slam dunked and another $500 ching ching and
then the other parent $500 ching ching. Now tell me how that is right
and just?



I have every right and every reason to write about this injustice.
And I do have an angle, it is called EQUAL JUSTICE for all
Dear Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, CCISD, Legislators & South Texas Judiciary

In an agressive collateral campaign in advocacy of South Texas as a Whole; the issue of Education must be for the children (our future). I submit in good faith my "TWO CENTS" (Dos Centavos).
Legislation - Students need to be able to earn and get paid weekly. WIA JOB Grants attendance selective railroading must cease immediately. It is a racket of cushy JOBS and truant officers who cannot discourage even the skipping in the middle of the school day.
I remember MR Gonzalez (GONZO) at Carroll High School back in the days of punch card bubble in "chad like" attendance cards. Student office workers picked up the cards every period and they were processed immediately. Any irregularities were addressed AND Gonzo, Mr Lyons & Mr Mon were on patrol with the cutting edge in technology Walkie Talkies. Not one other school in CCISD had them at that time. Janitors were the security.


My point is where is the lag and why now that this area has been significantly beefed up.

How are these kids tardy or hiding out or coming and going without someone noticing. Then they file against the parent for contributing to truancy and the student is fined and the parent has no defense even if there was never any communication from the district informing the parent. No attorney is provided as the crime is punishable by fine only. WATT about the people who cant pay? I have watched JAG lock students and parents up. 1 student $500, 2 Parents $500 each equals $1500. Community Service is an option but is it worth the association with hardened Juveniles. If there is a chance of being jailed an attorney must be provided. Any appeal is denied and handed back without signature of Court. There is no transcript of the proceedings so strong arm tactics are practiced and rules are ignored to get rich off of the poor. quality assurance Judiciary Evolution incomplete work in progress


Justice of the peace courts have jurisdiction over criminal offenses that are punishable by fine only, and over civil cases in which the amount in controversy is small (not more than $5,000 in 1995).

.

Remember the technique used at Miller?

Change Grades?

Modify Attendance records?

That is how they do it at CCISD.
My son failed the 7th Grade (2004-2005) and then failed in Summer School yet the Administrators Promoted him to the 8th Grade, The same thing for the 8th Grade at Cullen Middle School. However he performed well at SLGC Campus which is a rigid structured high discipline school. This school should be the model. It works.

Teach the test?

Make the numbers fit by rearranging the terminology?
Having certain students (who are at risk of not passing the TAKS) categorized in a way so their scores will not figure in the average.
Selectively classifying and targeting of certain students to enter the "revolving door" of our local legally untrained Justices of the Peace for tardies and truancy violations. And then no attorney to represent the kids so they are railroaded. Then when they cannot come up with the dinero they take the kids from the classroom in handcuffs and threaten to lock em up and do lock some of them up even though these violations are punishable by fine only. The JP has not the legal right or training to incarcerate a child or his parents for fine only violations.

Justice of the peace courts have jurisdiction over criminal offenses that are punishable by fine only, and over civil cases in which the amount in controversy is small (not more than $5,000 in 1995).

So the attendance issue is all about the money. If you can classify the student in a way to get paid then that is what they are told to do.


To encourage full participation, promote mutual understanding and cultivate shared responsibility throughout our community. To support everyone to do their best thinking and express it, To enable community members to search for inclusive solutions and build sustainable agreement