Feel The Byte

Sunday, September 2, 2007

Governor Perry, Our Official Objection To the Appointment of John Hubert (not even for Dog Catcher)

Governor Perry Our Official Objection To the Appointment of John Hubert (not even for Dog Catcher)

Posted by kingalonzoalvarezdepineda13 on September 1, 2007 at 5:29 a.m. (Suggest removal)

This man John Hubert is not fit to serve the people. He is a malicious prosecutor. Next week a Federal Lawsuit will be filed against the 105th District, Kleberg County, City of Kingsville, John Hubert alleging Civil Rights Violations, prosecution for personal interests, abuse of power, official oppression, falsifying documents, malicious prosecution, jury tampering with more to be listed upon the filing of the lawsuit next week. It is posible that this case will evolve into a class action lawsuit to engulf the Uranium Processing, the groundwater contamination and the complicity of Gov Rick Perry, Kleberg County, and the City of Kingsville.

A Tickler Of Events To Come!

Posted by dannoynted1 on September 1, 2007 at 5:34 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Carlos Valdez fired this joke.

Hubert fabricated evidence, lies to a jury and prosecutes based on "personal" vendettas.

Too bad his very own words will be soon catching up to him and his ilk.

Perry, you are so sweet, thank you, and on a silver platter just for all the world to see.

Hubert: "your Honor I'm gonna have to spend the rest of the summer in the library"

Chiuminatto: "Don't insult the intelligence of this court"

Oh Kingsville, this will be a menace to your society.

Posted by dannoynted1 on September 1, 2007 at 6:18 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Poor Gearhart he is prison thanks to this vindictive prevaricator.

Posted by dannoynted1 on September 1, 2007 at 6:22 a.m.

(This comment was removed by the site staff.)

Posted by laird30 on September 1, 2007 at 7:51 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Sounds like sour grapes or druggies on the lame.

Hubert is a great young man.

Sorry if you have cannon obey the laws of this country folks.

James

Posted by fish2026 on September 1, 2007 at 7:58 a.m. (Suggest removal)

I don't know this prosecutor, and only rarely do a case in Kingsville. I'm certainly not a big fan of Rick Perry- he's a mediocre governor at best.

On the other hand after reading the immature dribble that dannynted wrote its clear to see WHO is the one with problems.

Kingalonzo - If you're telling the truth - please email me a copy of the pleadings with all the allegations you claim fish2026@aol.com

If its going to be filed next week, then they should be substantially ready by now, and you seem to know all the allegations.

I'm skeptical of what you write but here's a chance to prove you're not just FULL OF IT.

Posted by kingalonzoalvarezdepineda13 on September 1, 2007 at 8 a.m. (Suggest removal)

John Hubert is not a great young man. If you would like to view the documentation I will be happy to discuss it with you. Should you decline, it is recommended that you stay out of the way. John Hubert maliciously prosecuted my wife and even admitted to her attorney Fred Jimenez that it was personal. He said, "You're damn right it's personal"!

Now, I believe there is a canon against that type of behavior and abuse of power?

How bout it James?

Anton.

Posted by fish2026 on September 1, 2007 at 8:01 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Aransas County remains - perhaps the largest county in the state ( that has not attempted to obtain their own DA. The state pays the DA salary and part of the office expense and there's grant money available. One of Aransas' commissioners said he was going to study it 6 months ago but I certainly haven't heard from him.

Although Aransas County crime is nothing like CC, its been rising and too many offenders are not prosecuted.

Posted by kingalonzoalvarezdepineda13 on September 1, 2007 at 8:09 a.m. (Suggest removal)

I just sent only the tip of the iceberg Mr fish.

Should you want to continue by all means let us carry on.

You will be embarrassed that you stuck up for this guy. I also have the paperwork listing his places of deployment and there is nothing about Iraq or the Gulf War.

Posted by dannoynted1 on September 1, 2007 at 8:11 a.m.

(This comment was removed by the site staff.)

Posted by kingalonzoalvarezdepineda13 on September 1, 2007 at 8:24 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Got to go pay respects to a fallen warrior be back in the afternoon.

TTFN

Posted by dannoynted1 on September 1, 2007 at 8:25 a.m. (Suggest removal)

But you owe your first born child .....he said it..in black and white and it is read all over!

Posted by benjalamela on September 1, 2007 at 9:07 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Let me get this right. Kleberg Co is in dire financial straits because of the icompetence of the co. judge. The judge says it won't cost the county anything for a new DA, right. The judge and the senator pushed for a new DA. Hubert is a republican, the co. judge and the senator are D's (ok DINO's) and they are backing Hubert. Orale, do they think we are blind - see ya in Nov 08.

Posted by quiet_guy_1999 on September 1, 2007 at 9:59 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Yeah - reputable information from someone who admits Hubert prosecuted his wife. You people are pathetic. Spend some time on bettering your own lives instead of attempting to ruin the lives of others. Hubert is a great guy - are ya all a little worried he may be the guy with the time to cease your illegal activities? I recognize you all from a blog where you go on and on and on spouting your untruths and slandering everyone who is associated with the law. Kingalonzo, you are so full of crap when you say you have documentation that can prove Hubert wasn't in Iraq. SO freakin full of crap. Pretty sure the lawsuit kingalonzo is talking about is going to materialize as a frivilous lawsuit from people who believe their civil rights have been violated because someone enforcing the law actually made someone in their family obey the law. give me a frickin break!!

Posted by kspcm01 on September 1, 2007 at 11:30 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Mr. Hubert is a good guy. He is quite competent and means well in trying to prosecute individuals guilty of criminal behavior. I do not at all believe that he is overzealous.

If he is guilty of anything, it is in caring for his community enough to warrant the foulish complaints of those who were successfully prosecuted. He strikes a good balance between crime and punishment and the judicial process. Yes, the process itself is sometimes a punishment (even for the innocent), but the motives are clean.

If this were an election, he would have my support.

Posted by dannoynted1 on September 1, 2007 at 1:31 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Not so quiet now verdad.........guy?

This Joke is going to get every thing he deserves and I won't have to do a thing!

Posted by kingalonzoalvarezdepineda13 on September 1, 2007 at 1:40 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Frivolous??

You know, sometimes it takes a civil suit just to bring the truth to the top, to be able to ask some questions and get some answers documented to right a wrongful act of the Kingsville prosecution. Now, if one County Attorney can get indicted why not the new DA as well. I will trade the civil litigation for the criminal prosecution of the ones you think so squeaky clean. We are the little people who remain obtuse regardless of one's feeling of superiorority. We are not going away and we will expect your apology when the truh surfaces. BTW, if there is any attorneys who would like to go on this magic carpet ride with me, now is the time.

As for Hubert, do you know who his sister is?

Which one of his relatives were involved in the Cheney shooting Whittington deal. Don t take my word for it go do some home work. I sat in the court room and watched this man lie through his teeth and when the truth began to come out he always interrupted and suppressed it.

Perry has a useful spot for John Hubert to be appointed but Hubert will fail to get elected when the time comes.

And one more thing.......

They drew first blood!

Posted by dannoynted1 on September 1, 2007 at 1:44 p.m. (Suggest removal)

means well in trying to prosecute individuals guilty of criminal then he better take a look in the mirror , tampered with evidence , fabricated evidence, presented false documents that is Fraud and he confessed he was prosecuting myself for "personal" reasons.

He is and will always be a malicious prevaricator and abuse his authority and just wait till it is his turn.

Ask him why Carlos Valdez FIRED him.

Posted by kingalonzoalvarezdepineda13 on September 1, 2007 at 1:44 p.m. (Suggest removal)

As for illegal activities, will you please support your comments with some substance.

Either put up or shut up.

But you know the Federal Investigations occurring in this town right now started with one little phone call and some very credible proof.

Posted by kingalonzoalvarezdepineda13 on September 1, 2007 at 1:52 p.m. (Suggest removal)

I applaud your condescension.

Keep fueling my fire?

.

Posted by kingalonzoalvarezdepineda13 on September 1, 2007 at 2:05 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Go look up a case named Gearhart.

See if you can get the video from the cop car camera when they are the ones who screwed up?

The camera never works when the citizen request it.

John Hubert has no jurisdiction in Nueces County and that is where I live.

Quiet Guy you dont stand up for your wife?

My credibility resounds from CC Town all the way to the District.

Why so quicjk to take the side of a Kleberg Prosecutor whose blood relative was part of the Whittington shooting cover up?

Did Bo come forward and reveal that Cheny was drunker than a skunk?

Posted by kingalonzoalvarezdepineda13 on September 1, 2007 at 2:14 p.m. (Suggest removal)

One more point

I am here as myself my identity announced.

Most of you attack from behind anonymity and if it takes that protection for you to become engaged then it is worth it.

Go back and look at how many times my words have been discounted only to become truth and common knowledge after the discourse and fact checking.

Posted by dannoynted1 on September 1, 2007 at 3:05 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Hey Alfred Isassi still think you were the target of politics . Or set up or halo.....both.?

Someone had an agenda and you were not going to stop this prevaricator from getting his way.

Daynor Roberts.

Ever since Hubert was fired he has been trying to get his own "district" Attorney JOB since he was fired he has been the main lobby behind this "newly created" JOB.......just for him.
You had the nerve to get in his way and presto your under indictment , how nice for the family eh?

Nepotism and cronism, wonder what his sister got on these mentirosos?

Go ahead and delete my words they are going elsewhere........I am not the one that engineered "Sam Fugate chronicles".
This guy(Hubert) will lose come election time unless of couse him and mamone pete (manicured nails pete) rig it like they did against Phil Esquivel mayor elected by the people of Kingsville only to be replaced by the white bitter men faction of Kingsville.
What is the Grand dragons name ........Virginia Frenzel and her BUNCH?

Sam Granato, .......another lawsuit that KV lost.

Pete De la Garza is the winner of the coconut of the week.

Yup had to get rid of the color that is not to say the last one is DeLa Garza now that you helped out the bitter men........They do not need you anymore Pete.

Time has a way of desperate people who use others because they can and you my dear Pete will soon see things are not going to be like they
"used to be".

no more Kings Inn with the people that done got you to sell out your people.

Posted by kingalonzoalvarezdepineda13 on September 1, 2007 at 3:38 p.m. (Suggest removal)

1 A Stay of Mandate t file Writ of Cert

2 File Writ of Certiorari

3 Initiate Civil Due Process and file Plaintiff first request for Discovery, written interrogatories and motions to take video deposition.

4 Serve everyone subpoenas and request for production of applicable agency policy of which the prosecution relied on to charge defendant and address TPU 105.

The suit will welcome all who can legitimately make a claim based on all remedies and protections under the U S Constitution.

.

Posted by kingalonzoalvarezdepineda13 on September 1, 2007 at 3:43 p.m. (Suggest removal)

For the mean time we are in the process of acquiring the Hvalinka V Schubert Modification of JOB opportunities styled Sam Granato V City of Kingsville, Carlos Valdez and a few other et als. When we obtain it we will make it available to the public.

Posted by quiet_guy_1999 on September 1, 2007 at 4:17 p.m. (Suggest removal)

LOL!!! Oh brother! My wife would never find herself in position to be prosecuted in the first place! I know several of the Hubert's personally. And I don't think anyone was fooled by the alleged "cover up" when Cheney shot his buddy. Anyone with a brain knows there was alcohol involved. You make a mockery of someone who upholds the law with your rants and raves....all of you do. Get a job, a real job!

Posted by kingalonzoalvarezdepineda13 on September 1, 2007 at 6:26 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Like you Quiet Guy? Yeah you are too good for all of us. You just placed your wife in terrible peril by saying, "My wife would never find herself in position to be prosecuted in the first place!". Very ignorant hubris on your part.

As far as that documentation it will be produced when the time is appropriate.

I wonder has your wife ever video taped a copyrighted movie or show and shown it at a party or public place?

Maybe she will accidentally run over someone while running late?

Maybe she will forget the quiet child in the back seat and remember a minute too late.

Do a little homework Hvalinka v Schubert and the manipulation of one's JOB opportunities.

Get a JOB you say as you know WATT you are talking about. My JOB gets better by the day even though I work at night. Why dont you just spit it out and introduce yourself?

You are a nobody and will never ascend in the communities of South Texas.

You know, John Hubert gives the Rivera Huberts a bad name.

As far as the Cheney prevarication it was an attempted cover up and was a cover up for many hours while Bo Hubert Acquiesced and obstructed justice. John Hubert obstructed Justice and withheld the exculpatory law and TPU to capture an unjust conviction.

As for your wife, you made some very foolish statements for the sake of a winning point, but how much Karma did you leverage?

I would never wish on your wife or any decent human being the last 7 years of hell my wife and family have endured.

I ask that GOD bless you and your family as many blessings as the product of all the sand grains on the beaches and all the stars in the universe raised to the infinity powered squared. God, I ask that the hubris of this husband be forgiven and that he humble himself in your presence. Let him receive the guidance from you to act appropriately.
Amen

Posted by rrempp on September 1, 2007 at 10 p.m. (Suggest removal)

What the hell is all this freakin ranting and raiving about? You sound ridiculous and malicious.

Posted by tamuk94 on September 1, 2007 at 10:05 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Hey King,

My only question is why did you put yourself in the position to have to "endure this hell"?

Also, what do you mean by "Riviera Hubert's". John is a "RIviera Hubert". You obviously don't know who his dad was. Just to let you know, it was Dr. Pat Hubert, DVM.

Posted by quiet_guy_1999 on September 1, 2007 at 10:13 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Oh brother!!!!!!!!!!!!! It's no wonder your wife is in trouble! Ahhh, but i am a somebody. Somebody who thinks you're a flaming lunatic! No more time spent here, folks. My foolish mind can't take no more!! hahahahahahahaha!!! As far as karma goes, a wise old witchdoctor once told me, karma begins in the car and ends with ma!! Oh, one more thing .... as far as my wife infringing upon copyright violations, I doubt we have to worry - she's a reader and a writer, not a television/movie watcher. And, she's never late for anything so I doubt she'll run anyone over in her haste to arrive on time. Nope, I'm not seeing it! But, just for the record, I REALLY REALLY hope God blesses you, too!

And to John Hubert, I'm proud of you bud. Stand tall, convictions firm, and go get 'em! Take it personally, John. It's your job to take the people who disobey the law personally. It's your job to protect my family from such people and I want you to take that job personally. Be safe, there are obviously some folks out there who just aren't too fond of you!!

Posted by dannoynted1 on September 1, 2007 at 11:10 p.m. (Suggest removal)

I am sure a good book is Heaven compared to your "Oh brother " BS

Hint : She reads so she don't have to hear you.

Posted by kingalonzoalvarezdepineda13 on September 1, 2007 at 11:13 p.m. (Suggest removal)

tamuk94: "why did you put yourself in the position to have to "endure this hell"?"

By following the guidance of a Texas Workforce Executive by the name of Mary Cano until she discounted Substitute Teaching, The Texas DHS charged wife with Tampering with a government document with intent to defraud & harm. A state jail felony 2 years in prison. I will tell you the details slowly. First, my family was on welfare. I took care of the kids while my wife earned her degree at A&I. Mary Cano the TWC Executive vice president worked directly with us. Then My wife graduated and started looking for a job. She used the TWC fax to send resumes and such. She interviewed for a job at EZ Pawn for the regional auditor. She was awarded the job and then they said they could not hire her because something came out of Austin that said they could not hire her. Austin is the EZ Pawn headquarters as well as the TWC. So I started Substitute teaching. Mary Cano sent me a outreach letter requiring me to attend an orientation. We called MRs Cano and told her that I was already working as a Substitute teacher. Mrs Cano insisted that I attend the orientation or she would be forced to penalize my family. She said, "Mr Haley the Texas Workforce Does not recognize substitute teaching as employment." I argued with her to no avail. Then I clarified. I asked her, "if I was going to be penalized for being unemployed because if "substitute teaching is not considered employment, then why should I need to count that income as income from employment?

If "substitute teaching" is not recognized as by the TWC as employment, how can the Texas Workforce penalize my family for being unemployed (Substitute Teaching as defined by TPU 105); while at the same time counting the income from Substitute Teaching as money from employment?

I worked one day in the first pay period. The net was $45. The taxes, social Security and Medicaid were deducted and I received ~$37. My wife made an entry in the application stating I had received "no money from work". This is what they prosecuted her for. We were becoming self sufficient as in the following months I began to work as did she. Then one day at lunch they came to my house and took her to jail. It is appreciated, your attention in this matter. We pray for relief in the interest of justice.

Posted by kingalonzoalvarezdepineda13 on September 1, 2007 at 11:14 p.m. (Suggest removal)

tamuk94: "Also, what do you mean by "Riviera Hubert's". John is a "RIviera Hubert". You obviously don't know who his dad was. Just to let you know, it was Dr. Pat Hubert, DVM."

You tripped yourself, what is a "RIviera Hubert".

I was born in Kingsville, my maternal Grandmother, aunts, uncles and cousins lived in various locations throughout the "Wild Horse Desert". My Uncle plumbed for Sarita and Elena Kenedy as well as the Horlocks, the Klebergs and a host of other who's who of South Texas. I have fished Baffin since i was in diapers and I was a huge fan of Gil Stenke.

I will put it in terms of Malicious Prosecutor John Hubert as he employs his family name to gain favor with Juries.

He says, "To know my family is to love my family".

His sister Patti is a Federal Prosecutor at the CC Fed Courthouse and Patti's husband is Randolph Boothe.

Dr Hubert was my veterinarian for a stray puppy who had a bad case of the mange. We told him how she just appeared on our porch and we wanted to help her but we only had about $10. The medicine she needed we could not afford. Up until this point Dr Hubert was a moderate grumpy man. Dr Hubert's whole demeanor changed; energetically, he went sorting through his organized mess digging back into the archives and found a gallon of concentrate. He mixed it up and poured it in a bottle and put a sticker on it with identifying info and directions. We named her Angel and she turned out to be a Guardian Angel as her name suggests. And he told us to go buy her some food.

rrempp, you have a choice to participate or go elsewhere. It is your choice; if you dont want to read such material make a choice.

Posted by kingalonzoalvarezdepineda13 on September 1, 2007 at 11:24 p.m. (Suggest removal)

JOhn Hubert will be rebuked through due process of the law, something he did not follow while maliciously prosecuting my wife for his personal satisfaction.

YOU'RE DAMN RIGHT IT IS PERSONAL!

quiet_guy_1999,

you wrote, "No more time spent here, folks".

Are you giving us your word on that quiet_guy_1999?

Posted by kingalonzoalvarezdepineda13 on September 1, 2007 at 11:54 p.m. (Suggest removal)

quiet_guy_1999,

Oh, one more thing .... as far as YOUR wife;.............

Get out of that river guy!

Speaking of Guy, how bout Guy Williams as district attorney for Kleberg and Kenedy Counties?

District Attorney Guy Williams; now, that has a true ring to it.

Posted by rrempp on September 1, 2007 at 11:55 p.m. (Suggest removal)

I was just curiously observing....noting that you were the one that curiously stuck up for Mikal Watts as our next US Senator. And that if Mikal Watts had wanted Jimmy Rodriguez to be our next Nueces County Sheriff then Mikal Watts could have made it happen. Just trying to figure you out. Definitly come to the conclusion that you are a Democrat. A ranting and raving one at that. Mikal Watts sent trash to my mail box to try and sway the vote against Jim Kaelin and thats the end of that.
Watts is not looking out for the little guys thats for sure. He lies and you defended him and like I said, I was just observing your demeaner. I'm excited about next November! See ya at the polls

Posted by kingalonzoalvarezdepineda13 on September 1, 2007 at 11:56 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Get out of that river!

Posted by kingalonzoalvarezdepineda13 on September 2, 2007 at 12:15 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Mikal Watts is from here. He grew up here and his roots remain here. If you did not understand the Sheriff Race and the final arrangements Mikal let Jimmy go at the end. Jimmy ran out of gas and did not finish with any energy WATT so ever. I loathe cheaters and IMO Mikal and the Club did not play fair but still they broke no law. Our little group of Defenders forced the Good Govt PAC to spend several hundres thousand more than they ever anticipated. We are a viable and influential presence and we demand respect. That means Mikal Watts as well.

rrempp: "Just trying to figure you out."

"I am a fly, and I am going at a Lion, I am now in his ear, He will scratch and scratch at his ear trying to get me out, he will scratch until he is bleeding, he will scratch himself to death trying to get me out of his ear."

Notice above and before you boxed me in as a Democrat;

I am "middle aisled"

Posted by rrempp on September 2, 2007 at 12:19 a.m. (Suggest removal)

thankyou for trying to explain this in a civil way, I will let it go because the end result was positive. The right man for the job prevailed. All is good.

Posted by kingalonzoalvarezdepineda13 on September 2, 2007 at 12:38 a.m. (Suggest removal)

rrempp,

It is far from over.

For it to be over, John Hubert must Allocute, Acquit and Apologize to my family.

He will not prevail in any election with this comedy of errors littering up the house. It is a housekeeping issue.

I remain.

a formal response will be served on the Governor's Mansion.

Since you opened the door with Mikal, maybe I should engage his skills as well. Pressure is WATT the three stooges will deal with on a daily basis.

Posted by rrempp on September 2, 2007 at 1:15 a.m. (Suggest removal)

What?? I was talking about Jim Kaelin being the winner and the right man for the Sheriffs job. I don't think we're on the same page.
I do not have any feelings one way or the other about the new DA post.

Posted by kingalonzoalvarezdepineda13 on September 2, 2007 at 2:04 a.m. (Suggest removal)

I like Jim Kaelin and I liked Larry Olivarez.

With Jimmy Rodriguez who IMO was the one in the driver's seat and that he should remain.

The mold and eroding jail conditions are not because Larry or Jimmy let it happen.

And not because Shamsie & the Nueces County Commissioners were not informed.

Now, to the heart of the matter; the "Shamsie Tick" FKA the "Shamsie Clique" Network of Avarice and Fiscal Loophole Specialties.

The communication was conducted beneath the Public Eye.

Remember the company building the robstown facility LSC wanted to take their toys and go home if Alvarez prevailed. There is a Lencho factor to consider as well. Lencho let Alvarez get pinched & squeezed. Alvarez made a fatal mistake reneging.

http://coupdmaitre.blogspot.com/2006/11/...

The Federal Prisoners were pulled out because somebody did not get their way. I believe it was Randy Delay after Shamsie gave the go ahead. The link below is a must read for the Sheriff and Constitutional County Judge.



--
Kenedeno & Associates

1 comment:

texsam said...

Sam Granato wins again over officer fired for being mentally unfit.
had accused Granato of "RETALIATION"
Posted on July 28, 2010 by Dennis Westlind
Yesterday the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a decision approving of an employer's use of a "preemptive" fitness for duty examination for an employee who exhibited bizarre and erratic behavior in the workplace, even though that behavior had not yet impacted his job performance. Click here to read the full opinion in Brownfield v. City of Yakima.

In Brownfield, a police officer was ordered to undergo a fitness for duty examination after he displayed several strange behaviors in and out of the workplace: swearing at and arguing with another officer, becoming upset after a child teased him during a traffic stop, domestic violence at home, and making vague suicidal comments . The City required Brownfield to undergo a fitness for duty examinations to determine whether he could perform police duties. When Brownfield refused, the City terminated him. Brownfield sued, alleging the City violated the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA") by unlawfully requiring a fitness for duty examination.

The Ninth Circuit held that the City did not violate the ADA by requiring the fitness for duty examination. Under the ADA, an employer may not require a fitness for duty examination "unless such examination ... is shown to be job-related and consistent with business necessity." The Ninth Circuit rejected Brownfield's argument that the examination could not be job-related unless the City showed Brownfield's job performance was affected by his behavior. Rather, the court held that a "propyhlacitc psychological examination" following an employee's erratic behavior may be job-related and satisfy the business necessity standard even though job performance is not impacted.

When can an employer order an employee who is behaving erratically to undergo a fitness for duty examination? In Brownfield, the Ninth Circuit adopted a "reasonable person" standard: the employer can order the examination when faced with "significant evidence that could cause a reasonable person to inquire as to whether an employee is still capable of performing his job." The court also warned against overuse of such examinations, however: "an employee's behavior cannot be merely annoying or inefficient to justify an examination; rather, there must be genuine reason to doubt whether that employee can perform job-related functions."

Brownfield will give employers in the Ninth Circuit greater leeway in addressing an employee's erratic behavior. Before ordering such an examination, however, employers should consider whether the behavior could raise a serious question of whether the employee can still perform the essential functions of his job. Overuse of such examinations could lead to meritorious discrimination claims.

Tags: ADA, Act', Brownfield v. City of Yakima" Yakima Brownfield ADA , FFDE, americans, disabilities, fitness for duty examination, preemptive, prophylactic, with