Feel The Byte

Thursday, March 26, 2009

Parkdale Plaza Demolition / Walmart Center Site

Dear John Marez & Esteemed Council Members,

Please accept this communication knowing I bring my concerns to you with the utmost confidence. Concerning the demolition of the Parkdale Plaza Structure, I believe may contain asbestos and if so appropriate abatement processes must be adhered to for the health and safety of the proximate community. Your service is appreciated and as always your response I await.

Sincerely,

Anton Haley 

--
Kenedeño  & Associates
Phone (361) 774-9103
Posted by at No comments:

Monday, January 19, 2009

Dear Lou Dobbs, How Bout That For Groundwork?

Dear Lou Dobbs, How Bout That For Groundwork?

Nice Work Guys!

Bush commutes sentences of former US border agents

One of outgoing President's last acts, Bush frees men convicted of shooting Mexican drug dealer

Associated Press
Monday, January 19, 2009

WASHINGTON — In his final acts of clemency, President George W. Bush on Monday commuted the prison sentences of two former U.S. Border Patrol agents whose convictions for shooting a Mexican drug dealer ignited fierce debate about illegal immigration.

Bush's decision to commute the sentences of Ignacio Ramos and Jose Compean, who tried to cover up the shooting, was welcomed by both Republican and Democratic members of Congress. They had long argued that the agents were merely doing their jobs, defending the American border against criminals. They also maintained that the more than 10-year prison sentences the pair was given were too harsh.

Rancor over their convictions, sentencing and firings has simmered ever since the shooting occurred in 2005. The former border guards in El Paso, Texas, are expected to be released from prison within the next two months.

"After four years of fighting this, it's taken a toll on me and my daughter, and really the whole family," said Joe Loya, Ramos' father-in law, who has received tens of thousands of supportive e-mails and spent much of the past two years traveling the country to speak about the case.

He said his daughter, Monica Ramos, called from New York after learning the news that her husband was to be released from a federal prison just outside Phoenix.

"She could hardly speak," Loya said.

Ramos and Compean became a rallying point among conservatives and on talk shows where their supporters called them heroes. Nearly the entire bipartisan congressional delegation from Texas and other lawmakers from both sides of the political aisle pleaded with Bush to grant them clemency.

Bush didn't pardon the men for their crimes, but decided instead to commute their sentences because he believed they were excessive and that they had already suffered the loss of their jobs, freedom and reputations, a senior administration official said.

The action by the president, who believes the border agents received fair trials and that the verdicts were just, does not diminish the seriousness of their crimes, the official said.

Compean and Ramos, were convicted of shooting admitted drug smuggler Osvaldo Aldrete Davila in the buttocks as he fled across the Rio Grande, away from an abandoned van load of marijuana. The border agents argued during their trials that they believed the smuggler was armed and that they shot him in self defense. The prosecutor in the case said there was no evidence linking the smuggler to the van of marijuana. The prosecutor also said the border agents didn't report the shooting and tampered with evidence by picking up several spent shell casings.

The agents were fired after their convictions on several charges, including assault with a dangerous weapon and with serious bodily injury, violation of civil rights and obstruction of justice. All their convictions, except obstruction of justice, were upheld on appeal.

Compean and Ramo were sentenced to 12 years and 11 years in prison, respectively. They each also were fined $2,000 and sentenced to three years of supervised release. Under the terms of Bush's commutation, their prison sentences will expire on March 20, but their three-year terms of supervised release and the fines will remain intact.

With the new acts of clemency, Bush has granted a total of 189 pardons and 11 commutations.

That's fewer than half as many as Presidents Bill Clinton or Ronald Reagan issued during their two-term tenures. Bush technically has until noon on Tuesday when President-elect Barack Obama is sworn into office to exercise his executive pardon authority, but presidential advisers said no more were forthcoming.

The president had made most of his pardon decisions on low-profile cases, but his batch in December created controversy.

Isaac Robert Toussie of Brooklyn, N.Y, convicted of making false statements to the Department of Housing and Urban Development and of mail fraud, was among 19 people Bush pardoned just before Christmas. But after learning in news reports that Toussie's father had donated tens of thousands of dollars to the Republican Party a few months ago, as well as other information, the president reversed his decision on Toussie's case.

The White House said the decision to revoke the pardon a step unheard of in recent memory was based on information about the extent and nature of Toussie's prior criminal offenses, and that neither the White House counsel's office nor the president had been aware of a political contribution by Toussie's father and wanted to avoid creating an appearance of impropriety.

In an earlier high-profile official act of forgiveness, Bush saved Vice President Dick Cheney's former chief of staff, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, from serving prison time in the case of the 2003 leak of CIA operative Valerie Plame's identity. Libby was convicted of perjury and obstructing justice. Bush could still grant him a full pardon, although Libby has not applied for one.

Clinton issued a total of 457 in eight years in office. Bush's father, George H. W. Bush, issued 77 in four years. Reagan issued 406 in eight years, and President Carter issued 563 in four years. Since World War II, the largest number of pardons and commutations 2,031 came from President Truman, who served 82 days short of eight years.



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Kenedeno Media <KenedenoNews@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 12:45 AM
Subject: [The Essence of Acquiescence] Dear Lou Dobbs, Last week LULAC & the American G...
To: kingalonzoalvarezdepinedaXIII@gmail.com


From: Jaime Kenedeno <kingalonzoalvarezdepinedaxiii@gmail.com>
To: elle mintry <dannoynted1@hotmail.com>
Date: Feb 25 2007 - 6:53am



--
Posted By Kenedeno Media to The Essence of Acquiescence at 8/11/2007 11:43:00 PM



--
Kenedeño  & Associates
Phone (361) 774-9103
Posted by at No comments:

Sunday, January 18, 2009

A real friend is one who walks in when the rest of the world walks out

A real friend is one who walks in when the rest of the world walks out.
Posted on January 18, 2009 at 03:12:40 AM by Jaime Kenedeño



"I usually get my stuff from people who promised somebody else that they would keep it a secret."

This entry below from a
"CC Guerilla" definitely one of those "IN THE KNOW".
"CC Guerilla" a follower of our legal odyssey focused on the Modification of JOB Opportunities and the Manufacturing of Prosecution of the Little People.


>Why hasn't anyone gone after Filemon personally as a way to derail Rose?
>If you go to www.fec.gov and follow the instructions on finding out who
>gave to whom, how much, and when, then load up Filemon Vela as an
>Individual Search you'll see he's made significant contributions to two
>notorious politicians. Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-CA) and Senator Robert
>Menendez (D-NJ). Hunter is an undicted coconspirator in the very same mess
>that sent ex-rep "Duke" Cunningham's#####to prison recently, and Menendez
>is currently under federal investigation for shady real estate dealings by
>renting a building he owns to a non-profit and pocketing $300, 000.00 in
>taxpayer subsidies.




The Velas are strictly personal with me for reasons of
>>>>>extreme hubris on their parts. There's a rather simple story
>>>>>associated with all of this and it's one of an extremely cruel act on
>>>>>their part that I witnessed and in no way involved me beyond being a
>>>>>spectator. And it was at that time that they got on my #### list.
>>>>>That he's a spoiled brat millionaire and she's a jurist and both with
>>>>>political agendas is purely coincidental. I only want to teach them a
>>>>>lesson. Be nice to everybody...because some people won't give a ####
>>>>>who or what you are and will come after you. That's what guerillas do
>>>>>kingal...go after the bigger bullies of the world.
>>>>>
>>>>>Another coincidence is that I would appear to be an unpaid, unknown and
>>>>>coincidental campaign worker for Hinojosa. I'm not. I'm about as
>>>>>apolitical as they come. My own personal view is that we've long (if
>>>>>ever it was the case) passed the time when getting the right person in
>>>>>office is a viable solution. To me, it's not so much of getting the
>>>>>best person in...but keeping the worst asshole OUT. I'm just that
>>>>>simple man.


* There is no excuse for violating the basic human rights afforded under the United States Constitution.
* How many kids were locked up by a court of nonrecord?
* Not even with a parent's consent unless the parent has been given the opportunity to consult with counsel.
* How many children taken into custody were advised of their Miranda Rights?
* Oh yeah, Plaisted and every CCISD kid for whom, he provided service

Whether by Political Targeting (to suppress election participation / engagement) or in retaliation to my past involvement in the Politics of South Texas, blatant acts of abuse of power, use (abuse) of Official position to strike blows in political expediency and exaction of personal vendettas, the violation of Civil Rights and the taking of Liberty by unauthorized process (lacking Jurisdiction) in direct violation of the Code of Criminal Procedure / Due Process Assurances by confining parents and children where the statutes clearly define punishment and sanctions to be by fine only and not by confinement. These words by fine only and not by confinement are words the South Texas Judiciary continues to work diligently to keep out of the record and hushed from the Public Citizenry.Why would we shut up now?

--
Kenedeño  & Associates
Phone (361) 774-9103
Posted by at 1 comment:

Thursday, January 8, 2009

Re: City Council District 3

Joe,

I believe in you. I believe you can not only stand up against the grain for the little people but also with your passionate diligence and diplomacy achieve the goals set out by actually getting the grain to align and go with you (and your belief in the little people).

 I know Joe Ortiz the man and will go to bat for his team any day of the week and twice on Sunday. In supporting Joe I have only good to speak of his incumbent opponent. In his other opponent, I speak of greatness in the endeavors of a man who has worn the hat of the RTA well and honorably. The main idea in this race is, both of Joe's opponents have had their opportunities and have delivered a success only limited by those in opposition to them; I believe Joe will gather the opposition and in unison they will all fly one way. I believe this is the case and I believe we need to give somebody else an opportunity to wear a hat as a community leader.

Give it a thought and give Joe a chance.

Sincerely

Jaime Kenedeno

On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 8:55 PM, joe ortiz <j1aortiz@yahoo.com> wrote:
I need your support in seeking the City Council District 3 elections.  Thank you for you time.
 
Joe A. Ortiz
 




--
Kenedeño  & Associates
Phone (361) 774-9103
Posted by at No comments:

Tuesday, December 16, 2008

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT TO REINSTATE ORIGINAL INTENT OF 74TH LEGISLATURE



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Jaime Kenedeno <kingalonzoalvarezdepinedaxiii@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 1:48 PM
Subject: A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT TO REINSTATE ORIGINAL INTENT OF 74TH LEGISLATURE
To: "solomon. ortizjr" <solomon.ortizjr@house.state.tx.us>, Abel.Herrero@house.state.tx.us, info@electtoddhunter.com, rob.eissler@house.state.tx.us, juan.hinojosa@senate.state.tx.us
Cc: lcox@nueces.esc2.net


Dear South Texas Legislators,

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT TO REINSTATE ORIGINAL INTENT OF 74TH LEGISLATURE: 74R SB 1 was authored by Senator Ratliff; while the Sponsor was Sadler. In this legislation, the term Recalcitrant Person cogently replaced the "intentionally, knowingly, recklessly, or with criminal negligence failing to require the child to attend school" Parent.

It is respectfully requested this law be considered for amendment and correction for Truant Officer Accountability / responsibility and an affirmative defense to the prosecution under Section 25.093. Below for submission for consideration is a model from which to begin.

Amendment A & B for Parent Contributing to non attendance

Amendment a § 25.093. PARENT CONTRIBUTING TO NONATTENDANCE. (a) [If] When a warning is issued as required by Section 25.095(a), and the parent recalcitrantly or with criminal negligence fails to require the child to attend school as required by law, and the child has absences for the amount of time specified under Section 25.094, the parent commits an offense. Amendment b § 25.093. PARENT CONTRIBUTING TO NONATTENDANCE. (a) If a warning is issued as required by Section 25.095(a), the parent recalcitrantly or with criminal negligence fails to require the child to attend school as required by law, and the child has absences for the amount of time specified under Section 25.094, the parent commits an offense.
§ 25.095. WARNING NOTICES. A school district shall notify a student's parent if the student has been absent from school, without excuse under Section 25.087, on three days or parts of days within a four-week period.
The notice must:
(1) inform the parent that:
(A) it is the Administrator's duty to immediately inform the parent of the student's irregular school attendance as they would inform the Parent of any serious injury or violation of law and require parental recognition in writing. (B) it is the Attendance Officer's duty to regulate school attendance and refer student's with irregular attendance patterns to the Principal(C) it is the parent's duty to be accessible to school administration and require the student to attend school;
(D) the parent is subject to prosecution under Section 25.093; and(E) if a parent did not receive anotice under Subsection (a) or (b) and
(2) the school district fails to demonstrate the due diligence in providing notice it is an affirmative defense to the prosecution under Section 25.093
(2) request a conference between school officials and the parent to discuss the absences. (3)It is an affirmative defense to
the prosecution under Section 25.093 if

(A) A Parent whose child is in
attendance at the beginning
of the school day and (B) The parent is cooperative
with the school administration
(c) In this section, "parent"
includes a person standing
in parental relation. (4) Be mailed by Certified Mail
return receipt requested.

--
Kenedeño  & Associates
Phone (361) 774-9103



--
Kenedeño  & Associates
Phone (361) 774-9103
Posted by at No comments:

Sunday, November 16, 2008

Re: Fwd: [Corpus Christi Caller Times] Corpus Christi police one of the worst in the s...


UPDATE CCPD ANOTHER CASE OF EXCESSIVE FORCE

Tasered Suspect Claims Police Brutality
Updated: Dec 16, 2008 11:14 PM



CORPUS CHRISTI - A Navy Corpsman was arrested and tasered for fleeing from police, and now the Corpusman is claiming he was the victim of excessive force and brutality.

A Navy Corpsman had been rushing home to get his fiance her emergency asthma medicines when police tried to pull him over. Police said he violated some traffic laws and refused to pull over.

However, the couple said the department owes them an apology and they have hired a lawyer.

"Her breathing became worse and I panicked," Nicholas Lowry, 26, said.

Lowry's fiance began having an asthma attack and he rushed to get her home Saturday night.

The police report indicated the officer started following the couple as soon as they sped right through the intersection of Baldwin and Ayers.

Lowry drove several blocks before stopping in his own driveway.

"I parked the car, turned the vehicle off, leaned over the window and I tried to tell the officer 'I'm sorry this is a medical emergency'," Lowry said.

However, before he could explain, Lowry said he was tasered, while sitting in his truck. He fell to the ground and was tasered again.

Lowry said things only escalated when Officer W. Hobbs criticized Lowry's service as a Navy Corpsman.

"Then, we walked in[to the jail] and he slammed me into a concrete wall. While taking me in, he laughed in my ear and said I'm gonna throw you in the cell with all the f-----, so they can rape you," Lowry said, of what Hobb's allegedly said.

Lowry's fiance took pictures of how officers scattered his military honors about while searching their truck.

Police said Lowry was already in the process of being cuffed when he tried to elbow the officer and a taser was authorized.

JK: IMHO The sentence below indicates the sentence above is untrue.

They also added that the bottom line was that it is a felony if a driver doesn't pull over for a cop.

"If this gentleman had pulled over, like he's required to do under the law, an ambulance could have been summoned or the officer could have escorted them to the hospital," CCPD Captain Todd Green said.

However, Lowry and his fiance said the behavior from the police was unacceptable .

"I think they should train their people. I felt like a criminal and we didn't do anything wrong," Nicki Redding, Lowry's fiance, said.

"It would be nice for someone to tell the truth and apologize," Lowry stated. "As far as the incident, I've forgiven the officer, I just want these kind of things to stop."

Police said the couple can file a complaint through their Internal Affairs Division and the arresting officer would be investigated.

Also, it's hard to validate that kind of situation because police said there was no dash cam video or recordings of the incident.

The couple is now talking with their lawyer and deciding what legal action they might pursue.

Online Reporter: Lauren Williamson



Very Insightful input!

On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Gordon Haley <gordondeanhaley@yahoo.com> wrote:

This was my posting that didn't show:

Even though this situation lends itself to many variables which are interpretable and may side on either the student or the CCPD office, I would like to bring up a few points which have not been addressed on prior postings.

1) Did the officer utilize CCPD issued equipment which require disposable charge cartridge replacements?

2) If so, did the CCPD pay for the replacement cartridge on the Taser gun that was used while the "Off Duty" Policeman was "moonlighting"?

3) What does the Charter School Board Policy state as far as corporal and/or physical punishment on students by school faculty?

4) Did we not do away with "shock therapy" in prior historical events namely Adolph Hitler and his experimentations with humans?

5) Before the student was provoked, was the student causing harm to himself or anyone else?

6) As some have stated that there were witnesses, I would pose the question why were the witnesses not given the "taser treatment" to redirect them out of the same area?

7) As a part time employ, the CCPD on site should have to abide by all educational rules and regulations. If a CCPD officer is not informed or properly trained in the Texas State Board of Educators guidelines, then he/she should not even be on a School Campus.

8) It was mentioned that the CCPD was dispatched, did the officer make a special trip to the school or was the officer in the school already? Who dispatched the officer?

9) Where is the surveillance video to protect the Students/Faculty?

10) As an educator, I am really taken back by the fact that School District Employees are mandated to not so much as even touch a student, but a part- time contract security employee can determine at will to taser a student who doesn't bow down before him. Is this the United States of America?

11) Was the officer truly threatened or was he/she wanting to get the taser use up as this was a current issue in the news last week?

12) Has the Charter School notified in writing to the students and the parents of the students attending that charter school that the Tasers are permitted on campus and the use of Tasers are permitted under the Charter Schools Board policy as a use of force and under what conditions that use of force is appropriate?

13) Has a taser ever been used in CCISD campus on a minor student? Why or why not?Who was Rodney Kings Lawyer?

--- On Sun, 11/16/08, Jaime Kenedeno <kingalonzoalvarezdepinedaxiii@gmail.com> wrote:

From: Jaime Kenedeno <kingalonzoalvarezdepinedaxiii@gmail.com>
Subject: Fwd: [Corpus Christi Caller Times] Corpus Christi police one of the worst in the s...
To: bryans@cctexas.com
Date: Sunday, November 16, 2008, 11:31 AM




---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: The Advocate <kingalonzoalvarezdepinedaXIII@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 3:18 AM
Subject: [Corpus Christi Caller Times] Corpus Christi police one of the worst in the s...
To: kingalonzoalvarezdepinedaxiii@gmail.com


[http://ccwatchdog.blogspot.com/2008/11/witnesses-including-faculty-members.html]

Send us your stories, photos, or video that shows the world the lack of professionalism some members of the CCPD have.


Info@ccpdbrutality.com

- News -

The lack of statistical comparison notwithstanding, Corpus Christi police say their excessive force complaints are few.

Christopher Gale, a San Antonio lawyer known throughout the state for representing people with excessive force complaints, says otherwise. He claims it's one of the worst in the state for excessive force complaints.

"It's not just a couple of bad seeds. It's a pervasive attitude that you can get away with it, where they feel like they're above it and right now I think they are," Gale said. "I probably get three calls a day regarding complaints about CCPD."

--
Posted By The Advocate to Corpus Christi Caller Times at 11/16/2008 01:03:00 AM

--
Kenedeño & Associates
Phone (361) 774-9103




--
Kenedeño & Associates
Phone (361) 774-9103
Posted by at 2 comments:

Thursday, November 13, 2008

Witnesses including faculty members dispute the events as reported and tell a different story

There are several details that remain unrevealed and there are inaccuracies in this reporter's story.

The sweatbands do not have 3 inch spikes screws or nails. They are about 3/4 inch wood screws. (Why the need to exaggerate?) As far as classifying them as a weapon; I suppose any item with mass and volume can be employed as a weapon and could injure another if the right sequence of events occur. The sweatbands were worn as a form of expression and the only reason they are mentioned is to excuse the unprofessional acts of a whole group of officers who "moonlight" at the Charter School. The article fails to mention the Food fight / riot that occurred a few weeks ago nor does it mention the fights where the CCPD has been dispatched but even more astonishing is the level of violence that went on during these previous events and the use of tasers to regain control or order. In fact, there were no instances where officers used tasers at this campus although the factor of danger in the previous events was exponentially higher.  

The student has worn these sweatbands for the last year and everyday for the entire school year without 1 complaint from faculty or administration. They were not in violation of the campus dress code and the Principal was in contact with the young man daily.

Since when does it become the Police Officers' duty to govern a student's behavior with a citation. A student who is on campus and enters an area that is "off limits" is disciplined by law enforcement? Where are the educators? Surely we will stop short of issuing citations to students who fail tests or even make wrong answers on their homework? Disruptive Behavior...... lets look at this a little closer. The author cites the an Officer Green who says Officer Mendoza said, "The student was in an area of the school that is off limits to students," We should examine the reason this area was off limits and why is it accessible to the students. The structure is now a makeshift building that used to be a Elementary school built a long time ago. So is it up to code? Probably not. Does it contain asbestos? Probably. If he was the only student in the forbidden area then what students did he disrupt and why would an officer say to him I am tired of your shit and it not be included in the report? Then if there was a legitimate reason for writing the student a citation should the officer not involve a campus administrator, should the officer not explain the reasoning for issuing the citation? These points are mentioned because the student repeatedly asked what the citation was for, what did he do to merit the hostility and to conference with the officer and the Principal. The reason the student refused to provide his name and personal information was because the officer refused to inform the student of the allegations, charges and or violations for which personal information was to be used and if in fact the Officer was tired of his shit then why would he still not know the student's name? So when the student refused to give his name because of the Officer's refusal to inform him of the charge for which the student's name was being required; the officer escalated the situation by threats of going to jail and then grabbing the boy and trying slam him into the wall when the student resisted being slammed into the wall and then reclaiming his personal space by instinctively repelling the officer and telling him to get away leave him alone as the student believed the Officer to be acting unlawfully towards him. The officer remained unthreatened physically escalated (threatened) the situation once again, asking the student if "he wanted to get tased" while drawing out his taser. The student once again pleaded with the officer that it was a big misunderstanding and wanted to go talk to the principal so they could settle the situation? He did not know the Principal was off campus. The student raised his hands as a surrendering gesture ( A PAX) and said lets go talk to the principal as he said those words the Officer fired the taser into his chest and remained holding the button down while the student seizured and soiled himself. It was a prolonged shock and it was out of frustration that the officer aced and not out of a physical threat or endangerment.

Witnesses including faculty members dispute the events as reported and  tell a different story and will testify on the student's behalf.



The FBI will be investigating the incident and all other details will remain out of the media until investigation is complete.

The question to be pondered is if the student was attacking / swinging / aggressive towards the officer, then why was the charge of assaulting an officer not filed? If he was using a weapon then why not the charge of assault with a deadly weapon? Good questions right?  The principal was off campus when the incident occurred. The student was never kicked out of any other district, he was placed there for a more structured and supervised environment. The student was one of the better students at the school. The Officers' conduct as a whole was unprofessional and in fact manufactured the events that occurred on 11/11/2008. The actions and the evidence will come to light as the vindication process moves forward. 

Now lets go to the school and start asking some questions and not take the word of a principal and a short tempered officer both who are trying to cover their a$$e$.

Officer uses Taser on unruly student
Officer says student tried to hit him with homemade weapon

Staff Reports
Wednesday, November 12, 2008

CORPUS CHRISTI — An off-duty Corpus Christi police officer used a Taser on a 16-year-old charter school student Tuesday, after the officer said the student tried to strike him with a homemade weapon.

Capt. Todd Green said Officer David Mendoza, who was working security at Cesar E. Chavez Academy at the time of the incident, was going to cite the student at 11:54 a.m. Tuesday on a disruptive activities charge, a misdemeanor, after the student failed to follow the officer's directions to clear a hallway at the school, 3701 Mueller St. The student was in an area of the school that is off limits to students, Green said.

When the teen wouldn't give Mendoza his name, the officer attempted to arrest him and the teen pulled away, pushed Mendoza and swung at the officer with a black sweatband that had several 3-inch nails and screws in it, Green said.

Green said the teen had been warned in the past by police and school officials not to wear the wristband.

Mendoza used his Taser on the teen, who police said wasn't injured. Mendoza suffered a puncture wound to his right thumb and was given a tetanus shot.

The teen was taken to Nueces County Juvenile Justice Center on suspicion of resisting arrest, having a prohibited weapon and disruptive activities.

Green said police supervisors will conduct a review process within the next few days to determine whether Mendoza was justified in using the Taser in this instance. Such a review is standard whenever an officer uses a Taser on someone, Green said.

Contact Stuart Duncan at 886-3792 or duncans@caller.com

(85) User Comments:
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 711805 on November 12, 2008 at 11:47 a.m.

"When the juvenile would not give the officer his name, the officer attempted to arrest the juvenile..."

Interesting...
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 450666 on November 12, 2008 at 11:47 a.m.

What a life this punk is going to have. Probably will be very short one at that!
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 714505 on November 12, 2008 at 11:52 a.m.

Sounds like he had it coming. What happened to kids being respectful of adults??
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 281033 on November 12, 2008 at 11:53 a.m.

sad times bro.... sad times
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 246926 on November 12, 2008 at 11:54 a.m.

What are these police doing in schools? They are asked to be there by the administration?

Do kids really understand what this means - having a police officer in school? These are not the kindly, avuncular officers of yesteryear. We are putting trained killers in our schools, and the extent of their power is not explained to kids nor understood by the kids or teachers or administrators.

If a kid can be TAZED for being a punky kid and not giving his name fast enough to satisfy a taser-happy cop then we have a situation ripe for a killing.

This just doesn't sound right to me.
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 356013 on November 12, 2008 at 11:58 a.m.

in response to 246926

Did you miss the part about a band with nails, homemade weapon part of this story..
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 702459 on November 12, 2008 at 12:04 p.m.

I'm glad we have police officers in our schools. Good job!!
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 235933 on November 12, 2008 at 12:04 p.m.

They need to bring back the good, old fashioned wooden paddle, and have ALL PARENTS sing-off on allowing teachers or administrators to use it when justified.

I signed a couple in my school days, and I turned out just fine.
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 233514 on November 12, 2008 at 12:06 p.m.

#246926

Are you for real?

I'm still trying to pick my jaw up from the floor. When I read the part about the nails/screws... I'm flabbergasted! Be glad that getting tasered is all he got!

And people wonder why they have police officers in schools... hmm
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 235785 on November 12, 2008 at 12:08 p.m.

in response to 246926

Wow ! Trained killers ? I being a ex cop was never trained to kill . I was trained to protect and uphold the laws of Texas . Did you want the officer to let the kid hit him with a weapon ? The reason kids think they can get away with things like this is becouse of liberal people like you ! And I bet once he or she gets home they will tell there parents I didnt do that . And the parents will run to the first lawyer they see on tv . Yes it is a sad time bro . Yes it is !
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 714303 on November 12, 2008 at 12:10 p.m.

I just love to hear comments concerning police in the schools. If the "so-called student" will attack a police officer, he would attack other students, staff members or faculty.

Everyone who complains about a police presence should spent a day in the halls of any high school campus in this city. Threaten a teacher or a police officer and you should expect to be taken down.

This "so-called student" is lucky that his head was not caved-in.

Great job by the police officer...tase any out of control individulals on any CCISD campuses!
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 401151 on November 12, 2008 at 12:10 p.m.

"When the juvenile would not give the officer his name, the officer attempted to arrest the juvenile and the teen tried to strike the officer with a homemade weapon which consisted of black sweatband that had several 3 inch nails, and screws in it."

UHHHH YEAHHHH!!!! I'd taze the punk too if he tried to strike at me with something that had 3 inch nails in it!
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 262709 on November 12, 2008 at 12:12 p.m.

in response to 246926

Spoken like a true id10t

Sad Times Bro........Sad Times
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 714303 on November 12, 2008 at 12:12 p.m.

in response to 246926

Right and OJ did'nt do it...Your comment is lame!
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 244548 on November 12, 2008 at 12:13 p.m.

in response to 246926

Can you read? And why are police officers in schools...is that even a serious question? Have you ever heard of Columbine?
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 699260 on November 12, 2008 at 12:15 p.m.

in response to 246926

"Trained killers" is correct, you just have the shoe on the wrong foot...

Sweetie ;-)
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 251057 on November 12, 2008 at 12:16 p.m.

Poor kid was just trying to show the officer his art project...
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 714649 on November 12, 2008 at 12:17 p.m.

Trained killers? if that were true the cop should have just shot the kid. it likely would save the taxpayers lots of money down the road.
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 405145 on November 12, 2008 at 12:17 p.m.

in response to 246926

these are also not the kindly, avuncular kids of yesteryear.
the police officer was protecting himself and other students around him by using his taser. It seems to me the police officer showed professional restraint with his use of force.

the kid was wielding a weapon which could have caused serious damage. he was not being a "punky" kid as you say.

great job,
ccpd
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 248197 on November 12, 2008 at 12:27 p.m.

Kudos to the officer for doing what he had to do. I would have been tempted to just shoot the kid.
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 281562 on November 12, 2008 at 12:27 p.m.

In response to 246926, All CCISD schools have Police officer's on campus to help maintain order and protect the students and faculty from the likes of juvienille deliquents walking around with home made weapons, like sweat bands with nails and screws. As far as this particular school, it is a school were unruly kids go after they get suspended from their regular high school, in short a school for trouble makers. So having extra police officers there only makes sense. As far as the kids knowing why the officers are on site, it's because of them and they are well aware of it. This little thug thought he could cause some harm to an officer of the law with a home made weapon he had no buisness having in his possession. This kid should just be thankful he was only tazer and not shot in the head by a bullet for being such a dumb s@hit. That officer had every right to do what he did, to protect himself. As far as arresting him for not giving his name, well he should have gave his name, if he didn't want to get arrested. I can already tell you this punk wil graduate from this alternative school and go to "COLLEGE", or how they like to refer to it as Pen State (penitentiary) where he will graduate with honors, as a member of a prison gang. And you sound like a concerned parent of one of these students, so make sure you explain to them the consequenses of their action before they get tazered as well.
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 711805 on November 12, 2008 at 12:29 p.m.

Obviously, the cop was defending himself, and if warranted, could've used deadly force.

However....I still do not understand the following:
"When the juvenile would not give the officer his name, the officer attempted to arrest the juvenile..."

Love it!
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 713414 on November 12, 2008 at 12:29 p.m.

in response to 246926

The poor PD and ISD, they just can't seem to please anybody these days. -if there was no protection in the school and that "punky" kid assaulted another student or teacher you are probably the type of person that would be screaming "why isn't there someone protecting everyone from this punk?"
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 711805 on November 12, 2008 at 12:32 p.m.

Post # 281562...."As far as arresting him for not giving his name, well he should have gave his name, if he didn't want to get arrested."

And you have access to a computer?
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 321845 on November 12, 2008 at 12:32 p.m.

Yea, he's a punk allright! Send him down the road. These punky teenaged gang affiliated idiots these days are worthless and will in no way ever become a productive member of society without serious intervention, if even then. They'd prefer to hang with their gang and involve themselves with criminal mischief around town trying to look tough. I say have a judge appoint him to the marines for some wake up medicine.
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 284374 on November 12, 2008 at 12:38 p.m.

I wish they would have recorded it, that way when he goes to jail and starts bragging to his fiends "i got tazered but that wasnt s@@t, then people can look it upon you tube and seem rolling around like a little b---.
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 459172 on November 12, 2008 at 12:42 p.m.

in response to 711805

At alternative campuses, the administrators must keep a tight reign. These students have already been expelled from the traditional campuses, so the rules are much stricter and with harsher consequences. Also, the officers can't be expected to remember the names of every student on campus (students at these campuses come and go). So his asking for the student's name is probably standard procedure. And, having been at CCISD campuses, I know what the typical response from one of these students would be: anything ranging from "NOYB" to "go to h**ll" or "WTF do you want to know for?"
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 711805 on November 12, 2008 at 12:46 p.m.

459172 ....good point
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 418086 on November 12, 2008 at 12:48 p.m.

Why is it so funny that the article says "When the juvenile would not give the officer his name, the officer attempted to arrest the juvenile..." Its against the law to not give a police officer your name its called failure to id so again whats so funny such as post 711805 Whats there to love? That he was doing his job?
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 241339 on November 12, 2008 at 12:51 p.m.

Great job by the CCPD Officer. This thug had the 3 inch nails and screws in that sweatband because he was already planning on using it on someone. His 1st mistake was being disruptive in the hallway. 2nd not giving the Officer his name for the citation he was about to recieve. 3rd taking a swing on a Officer with a homemade weapon. 3 strikes, we're out. Hope he enjoyed the shock of his life.
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 340633 on November 12, 2008 at 12:51 p.m.

way to go officer i would have tazed him a couple more time for good measure lol. Trying to act all bad not giving the cop his name what did he think was going to happen. Just another future productive member of society getting to know our local law enforcement in his early years lol
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 277445 on November 12, 2008 at 12:54 p.m.

Good job CCPD... Kids like that will end up being involved somehow in our next drive by shooting anyway... yep, sad times alright...
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 233778 on November 12, 2008 at 1:18 p.m.

WHat happened to a paddle?
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 251548 on November 12, 2008 at 1:21 p.m.

in response to 714303

I agree!!!!
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 714544 on November 12, 2008 at 1:26 p.m.

good, tazzerd his a..., for trying to hit him with some sort of prison weapon....sounds like that kid bettter get used to eating grill chesse sandwiches and watching american me
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 463910 on November 12, 2008 at 1:26 p.m.

I have seen a police officer at my daughters school but he was in uniform, do they usually work at the school in their own clothing? article states off duty officer? was he employed by this school? Do off duty police officers usually carry their pistols and stun guns? Just trying to figure out why the kid would do this, unless he did not know this guy was an officer. P.O. with their tats and attitude out of their uniform you might confuse them with a thug.
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 424782 on November 12, 2008 at 1:26 p.m.

I guess he'll get an opportunity to visit newly-appointed Judge Terry Shamsie's courtroom. Here you go, Terry. Show us how compassionate and firm you can be. Please don't send this little punk home with a little slap on the wrist.

Good job officer. One less roaming the halls and streets looking for the next victim.
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 715477 on November 12, 2008 at 1:36 p.m.

wouldnt it be safer to have metal detectors in the school instead of having a loose cop in the halls tasing kids that dont want to talk to him.
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 244726 on November 12, 2008 at 1:41 p.m.

Any person , whether it be a man,woman,or in this case punk kid....thinks they can dismiss a police officer after being asked what their name is, deserves whatever comes their way. The officers intuiton was right, punk had a weapon and tried to use it on an officer. At least we're not reading today another kid kills or stabs another student in school.....wake up people
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 239536 on November 12, 2008 at 1:43 p.m.

in response to 463910

Good point. Did he identify himself as an officer? My daughter once told me that an officer at her school started picking on a student just to get on the guys nerves and then when that boy became agitated he threw him on the floor and arrested him for what I am not sure but again per my daughter this young guy was a good kid? Anyways regardless the kid having a weapon was uncalled for and yes he should be punished.
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 715477 on November 12, 2008 at 1:45 p.m.

Tasing a kid for not saying what his name is does not give a Crazy Cop the right to tase him.
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 707118 on November 12, 2008 at 1:45 p.m.

I know that I or my fellow students would have not allowed anything like this go this far and that was in the late eighties. Shows the lack of respect this kids have nowadays. I'm not trying to say that his fellow classmates should have beaten the dogturd out of him , but i would have.
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 699873 on November 12, 2008 at 1:48 p.m.

ban all teenagers from the city.
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 715477 on November 12, 2008 at 1:48 p.m.

There seems to be alot of hostile adults talking about beating the kid, or shooting the kid, or way to go Crazy Taser Happy Cop, I hope you people are not raising or breeding any children like yourselves.
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 274667 on November 12, 2008 at 1:53 p.m.

FEAR NOT...Ye of little faith...
OBAMA will straighten all this out with his public service plan for all middle and senior high students!!!
You wait and see...
They'll learn by golly!!!
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 711534 on November 12, 2008 at 1:56 p.m.

Ok so the student had a weapon at school and will not be allowed to use it.... but I find it rather disturbing to think that a US Citizen can be arrested for refusing to identify one's self. When did that become a law?
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 715477 on November 12, 2008 at 1:57 p.m.

Obama Rocks!
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 459903 on November 12, 2008 at 1:58 p.m.

in response to 463910

Off duty does not mean plain clothes. If he was working the school he was in uniform. Off duty means not on city time.
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 714663 on November 12, 2008 at 1:58 p.m.

in response to 463910

CCPD policy states one can't work off duty anywhere if not in uniform. The only exception I believe is if the officer works security at an apartment complex where he or she resides and of course if working undercover.
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 459903 on November 12, 2008 at 1:59 p.m.

in response to 707118

If you believe that "story" from your daughter you are a moron. Get over yourselves people................
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 243871 on November 12, 2008 at 2 p.m.

no one knows what happened there so don't start accusing people. my grandson was thrown around by a cop at school and the principle had to correct the cop so it isn't always the kids fault. Unless you are there you don't know what happened. These cops are a little to happy with the taser guns
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 715477 on November 12, 2008 at 2:01 p.m.

I Agree with 711534, a kid WAS ATTACKED for not saying his NAME! I feel bad for that cop that attacked him with a taser, maybe that's why he's patrolling the school halls and not city streets because he's not good at being a police office.
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 387004 on November 12, 2008 at 2:03 p.m.

LOVE IT!!!! HAHA Little punk got what he deserved, maybe next time he won't act like such a turd!!! I bet you no other kids are going to give the cop any problems for the rest of the year there. OHHHH the PARENTS will now decide to be PARENTS and actually Care what their son's activities are. Hell zap the parents too, maybe that way they will will finally have something in common with their THUG son to talk about since they never taught him manners.
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 274667 on November 12, 2008 at 2:06 p.m.

June 22, 2004

The Supreme Court upheld a state law that makes it a crime to refuse to tell the police one's name when stopped for suspicious behavior, a ruling that strengthens the ability of law enforcement officers to detain citizens even where they lack enough evidence for a full arrest.

SO THERE!!!
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 711736 on November 12, 2008 at 2:11 p.m.

in response to 699873

LMAO
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 715477 on November 12, 2008 at 2:11 p.m.

What dont you people understand, A Kid was Attacked!!! If I were his parents I would make sure that Crazy Taser Cop went to Jail!!
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 460787 on November 12, 2008 at 2:25 p.m.

in response to 274667

It's only a crime for a person to refuse to identify himself if he has been lawfully arrested.

SO THERE
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 460787 on November 12, 2008 at 2:31 p.m.

Of course, in this case the officer could arrest the punk for trespassing on school grounds- after such lawful arrest it would be a crime for him not to identify himself.
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 239536 on November 12, 2008 at 2:36 p.m.

in response to 459903

Actually you responded to the wrong poster but I will respond to your remark. First how can you call me a moron when you dont even know me? Second of all I do believe my daughter because she has never given me any reason not to believe her. I am not saying that it was right what this kid did because it was very wrong but in some cases the kid is not always at fault.
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 459903 on November 12, 2008 at 2:44 p.m.

in response to 243871

EXACTLY........Unless your there then shut up
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 459903 on November 12, 2008 at 2:46 p.m.

in response to 239536

Your moronic response thats why...................
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 239536 on November 12, 2008 at 2:50 p.m.

in response to 459903

LOL you sound like a kid yourself :)
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 715477 on November 12, 2008 at 2:52 p.m.

That's it, im staying in Chicago, there's too much violence in Texas, people buying guns like its going out of style you should worry about texa's best in your kids schools tasing them instead of who said what.
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 431882 on November 12, 2008 at 3:06 p.m.

I've heard from teachers who, when trying to question or correct a kid in the hallway or at achool, will have the student just walk away and not even address the teacher.

They think that by ignoring authority, they can simply walk away from impending discipline.

Could you imagine what kind of damage he could have done to another student with a weapon like that?
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 366573 on November 12, 2008 at 3:07 p.m.

Charter School. That says it all. I can't say I've heard anything productive about them. Look how many are under investigation for falsifying enrollment, embezzlement, misuse of funds, etc. If the administrations are run that way, why would the curriculum lead students to a better path?
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 715477 on November 12, 2008 at 3:14 p.m.

The Bottom Line is that a (KID) was Attacked in School by a Police Officer, just because some fool has a badge does not give him the right to tase a KID. The cop should be tased too to see how it feels, imagine a kid!
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 301586 on November 12, 2008 at 3:22 p.m.

They have the worst kids their. He needs to protect those kids, staff and himself. What the heck would a kid have a weapon like that for? Someone would have been hurt or killed....Thank you..
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 715477 on November 12, 2008 at 3:36 p.m.

But the Fact is that the only person that was hurt (ATTACKED) was the kid!!!
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 708109 on November 12, 2008 at 3:47 p.m.

Bottom line is the juvenile had a WEAPON. Your missing the picture.
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 715477 on November 12, 2008 at 4:01 p.m.

But he was still attacked and the "weapon" was the taser the cop used. If there are so many people glad to know this kid got tased, why are so many of you, "Record Numbers" buying semi automatics? you should be more scared of you neighbors than a kid that doesnt want to give his name. Grow Up Texas!
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 235785 on November 12, 2008 at 4:07 p.m.

in response to 463910

Oh please 463910 ! The kid didnt know he was a cop ! How many adults do you know that just hang out at high school halls ? Of course the punk new he was a cop . And hello the school year is half way over . Its not this cops first day on the job at the school . Quite trying to protect these future @#$4*%*(*( ^U& !
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 235785 on November 12, 2008 at 4:09 p.m.

in response to 715477

Your a fool ! And that is the bottom line
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 235785 on November 12, 2008 at 4:14 p.m.

in response to 715477

Please stay in Chicago ! We gun loving Texans really dont need you here anyway . And the only reason were buying guns like its going out of style is becouse of the president you elected . See we know that he is going to start banning guns as soon as he has a chance . Better get yours too
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 715477 on November 12, 2008 at 4:19 p.m.

Who needs a semi automatic to hunt, Texas must have some scary deer if you need something like that, just use your Tasers, they work on Kids!! oh my BAD, the schools are already using them.
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 235785 on November 12, 2008 at 4:50 p.m.

in response to 715477

You poor ignorant person a semi automatic weapon is not just for deer hunting . I spent most of my youth shooting targets with my semi auto 22 . You cannot just say the gun is useless just becouse it is semi auto . Let me guess , hmm are you from california ? Becouse it sure sounds like it with your crazy talk
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 244726 on November 12, 2008 at 7:11 p.m.

Yes the kid did get tased and I would agree that doesn't look good on the officer, but WHY WAS HE TASED? Because the kid tried to use a conciled weapon on a POLICE officer, is that so hard to understand? There's a reason that this kid goes to this school and its not because he's too smart for CCISD!!!!!!!
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 375911 on November 12, 2008 at 7:21 p.m.

in response to 715477

This charming little child pulled a homemade prison shank on the officer. He is lucky that he was not shot dead!
Thats the whole story, no matter what you hand wringers have to say about it.
So now, he will live to commit even more crimes, I'll bet anyone lunch, that this "child" has a record already, and if you chart his future it is full of additional crime and ultimately an early death.
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 375911 on November 12, 2008 at 7:25 p.m.

Way to go CCPD!!!!!!!!!!!

Turn up the heat and lets take this city back from the scum and gangs!
The tipping point is now!
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 711805 on November 12, 2008 at 7:47 p.m.

The kid pulled the shank in self defense. He felt threatened by a man who demanded to speak to him, invaded his personal space, and was grabbing him (assaulting him). We later find out it was an officer trying to arrest the kid, but that was never disclosed during the ensuing scuffle. The kid did not know.
In addition, doesn't the kid have the right to have a weapon? I mean, if I can buy truck loads of semi-auto weapons in TX, I guess its ok for this kid to have a homemade weapon, right?
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 702420 on November 12, 2008 at 7:56 p.m.

in response to 715477

You're kidding, right? Too much violence in Texas?!? Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't you guys up in Chicago just have a high profile murder of 3 people???? Yes, you are right, people here are buying guns...for self defense against punks and thieves and killers,like the ones in your beloved Chicago.
BTW, please, please, please use spell check. Texas is spelled
T E X A S, not texa's. For that mistake, we don't want you back here, just stay up North.
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 702420 on November 12, 2008 at 7:58 p.m.

in response to 715477

Just so you know, to carry and use a taser, all police officers are required to be tasered themselves. Please get informed before you comment.
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 613882 on November 12, 2008 at 8:02 p.m.

in response to 711805

dear Clueless....

Even though you can buy truckloads of weapons, you cant carry them on school grounds, even if you're a delinquent 17 year old punk. This is the "prison" school within the district, this punk knew the deal when he took that homemade wristband to school.

He's just lucky a LEO confronted him and the punk didn't come across a CHL holder and get capped.
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 702420 on November 12, 2008 at 8:05 p.m.

in response to 715477

LMAO!!! Do you work for the ACLU or is there some deep rooted anger/resentment because you got your a$$ tasered because you felt your rights were violated because you couldn't carry your shank to school? Better yet, you're probably mad because your punk a$$ kid was put in place for acting unruly and disrespecting others. Just be glad you live in Chicago and not here, otherwise, you'd be next in getting some voltage with your liberal/kooky way of thinking.
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 244726 on November 12, 2008 at 8:11 p.m.

"kid pulled a shank in self defense"...." invaded his personal space"WOW! Your talking like the kid is in prison defending himself dude. On your point about doesn't he have the right to have a weapon....once again HE'S IN SCHOOL, not at home or in prison,YET! Do you take your semi-autos to work? wake up man!
Reply to this Post  |  Suggest removal
related links Posted by 707269 on November 12, 2008 at 11:01 p.m.

in response to 463910

The officers are off duty but yes in uniform and yes with their weapons. The kid knew what he was doing. He was tryin to be "hard" in front of his friends which SHOULD tell u right there why the officers are in the schools in the first place. These kids arent playing anymore they are really trying to do some serious harm. And who are you to comment on the way the OFF duty officers look?
Posted by at 5 comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)